Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35420734›Full record

ArticlePest management science2022

Sugar alcohols have the potential as bee-safe baits for the common wasp.

Stefanie Neupert, Jennifer M Jandt, Paul Szyszka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pest management science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stefanie NeupertDepartment of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4916-2874
Jennifer M JandtDepartment of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0991-8577
Paul SzyszkaDepartment of Zoology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2043-6656

Funding

University of Otago
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPest insects are often baited with poisoned feeding stimulants, the most common of which are sugars. However, sugars are attractive for most animal species, which makes it difficult to target only a specific pest insect species. Here, we assessed different sugar alcohols for their potential as more species-selective feeding stimulants for pest insects.

resultsWe tested the attractiveness of the sugar alcohols sorbitol, xylitol and erythritol with a capillary feeder assay in wasps (as potential pest insects, because introduced wasps are a pest in many regions) and bees (as non-target insects). For the common wasp (Vespula vulgaris), sorbitol and xylitol acted as nutritive feeding stimulants, and erythritol acted as a non-nutritive feeding stimulant. For the buff-tailed bumble bee (Bombus terrestris), sorbitol acted as a feeding stimulant, while for the honey bee (Apis mellifera), none of the sugar alcohols acted as feeding stimulant.

conclusionThe species-specific preferences for sugar alcohols suggest their potential as species-selective insect baits. The wasp-specific preference for xylitol suggests its potential as a bee-safe alternative to sugar-containing bait for controlling the common wasp. © 2022 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Indexed as

WaspsAnimalsBeesErythritolSorbitolSugar AlcoholsSugarsXylitolErythritolSorbitolSugar AlcoholsSugarsXylitolfeeding stimulanthoney beepest insectpolyolsocial insectstwo-choice capillary feeder assayVespula

Identifiers

PMID35420734
PMCPMC9324110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.