Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35420728›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing knowledge2023

Evaluation of the NANDA International, Inc. diagnostic classification in Spain: Development and validation of the EVALUAN-I tool.

Claudio Alberto Rodríguez-Suárez, María Naira Hernández-De Luis, María Isabel Mariscal-Crespo, Rafaela Camacho-Bejarano

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing knowledge, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Claudio Alberto Rodríguez-SuárezRN Maternal and Child Insular University Hospital Complex (Canary Islands Health Service), Associate Professor Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Las Palmas, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6226-7374
María Naira Hernández-De LuisRN Doctoral Primary Care Facility, Primary Healthcare Management, Gran Canaria (Canary Islands Health Service), Canary Islands, Las Palmas, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9720-3661
María Isabel Mariscal-CrespoFull Professor, Faculty of Nursing, University of Huelva, Huelva, Andalusia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0736-8695
Rafaela Camacho-BejaranoFull Professor, Faculty of Nursing, University of Huelva, Huelva, Andalusia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0716-5038
Universidad de Huelva · ESUniversidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria · ES

Funding

Fundación Canaria Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Canarias (FIISC) ENF-19/33
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop and validate a tool to evaluate the NANDA International, Inc. diagnostic classification.

methodsThe tool, EVALUAN-I, was validated in a non-probabilistic sample (N = 460) on Spanish Registered Nurses (September-December 2019) in two phases. First, design and construct the instrument in three steps: (1) literature review to define the construct focusing on the orientation toward nursing concepts and theoretical foundations, the level of scientific evidence, the structural configuration, the applicability, the nurses' clinical reasoning skills, and the attitudes toward nursing diagnosis, (2) substantiation of the questionnaire items and design according to the criteria for a diagnostic classification, (3) expert test to establish the face validity and content validity. The second phase revolved around (4) conducting a pilot test and measuring the temporal stability (test-retest) and Cohen's kappa coefficient; assessing psychometric properties by measuring (5) reliability (internal consistency using Cronbach alpha and interfactor correlation) and (6) construct validity (exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis). The manuscript follows the STROBE checklist. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee with registration number 2019-190-1.

findingsEVALUAN-I displayed moderate test-retest stability, adequate construct validity, and excellent reliability. The confirmatory factor analysis provided evidence about the configuration of EVALUAN-I in relation to nine analytical dimensions: clinical competence, nurses' reasoning skills, attitudes towards nursing diagnosis, discipline's central concepts, classification's contents, physiopathological attributes, level of scientific evidence, diagnostic precision, and conceptual correspondence between terminologies.

conclusionsEVALUAN-I is a valid and reliable instrument, which can be used to improve the epistemological, normative, and intuitive configuration of NANDA International, Inc. in a structured, systematic manner. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Comprehensive evaluation of NANDA International, Inc. in different clinical settings around the world using a validated instrument, like EVALUAN-I, would allow strengths and weaknesses to be identified and contribute to the classification's development and practical application.

Indexed as

Standardized Nursing TerminologyHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSpainSurveys and QuestionnairesVocabulary, Controllednursing diagnosisnursing methodology researchpsychometricsstandardized nursing terminologysurveys and questionnairesvalidation study

Identifiers

PMID35420728
PMCPMC10084200
OpenAlexW4223995223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.