Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35420669›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2022

Comparative Analyses of Complete Peronosporaceae (Oomycota) Mitogenome Sequences-Insights into Structural Evolution and Phylogeny.

Richard C Winkworth, Grace Neal, Raeya A Ogas, Briana C W Nelson, Patricia A McLenachan, Stanley E Bellgard, Peter J Lockhart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Complete mitochondrial genome of the litchi pathogenMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evolutionary Relationships of theEcology and evolution · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Whole-Genome Assembly forJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Richard C WinkworthBio-Protection Research Centre, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-5394-3094
Grace NealSchool of Natural Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Raeya A OgasSchool of Natural Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Briana C W NelsonSchool of Natural Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Patricia A McLenachanSchool of Natural Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Stanley E BellgardSchool of Natural Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Peter J LockhartBio-Protection Research Centre, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Members of the Peronosporaceae (Oomycota, Chromista), which currently consists of 25 genera and approximately 1,000 recognized species, are responsible for disease on a wide range of plant hosts. Molecular phylogenetic analyses over the last two decades have improved our understanding of evolutionary relationships within Peronosporaceae. To date, 16 numbered and three named clades have been recognized; it is clear from these studies that the current taxonomy does not reflect evolutionary relationships. Whole organelle genome sequences are an increasingly important source of phylogenetic information, and in this study, we present comparative and phylogenetic analyses of mitogenome sequences from 15 of the 19 currently recognized clades of Peronosporaceae, including 44 newly assembled sequences. Our analyses suggest strong conservation of mitogenome size and gene content across Peronosporaceae but, as previous studies have suggested, limited conservation of synteny. Specifically, we identified 28 distinct syntenies amongst the 71 examined isolates. Moreover, 19 of the isolates contained inverted or direct repeats, suggesting repeated sequences may be more common than previously thought. In terms of phylogenetic relationships, our analyses of 34 concatenated mitochondrial gene sequences resulted in a topology that was broadly consistent with previous studies. However, unlike previous studies concatenated mitochondrial sequences provided strong support for higher-level relationships within the family.

Indexed as

Genome, MitochondrialOomycetesEvolution, MolecularGenes, MitochondrialPhylogenySyntenygenome rearrangementsinverted repeatsmitochondrial genomePeronosporalessequence evolutionstructural diversitysynteny

Identifiers

PMID35420669
PMCPMC9020773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.