Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35420661›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Surveillance of Safety of 3 Doses of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination Using Electronic Health Records.

Michiel J M Niesen, Colin Pawlowski, John C O'Horo, Doug W Challener, Eli Silvert, Greg Donadio, Patrick J Lenehan, Abinash Virk, Melanie D Swift, Leigh L Speicher and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. COVID-19 Therapeutics: Use, Mechanism of Action, and Toxicity (Vaccines, Monoclonal Antibodies, and Immunotherapeutics).Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2023
    Review
  8. Protective RNA nanovaccines againstFrontiers in immunology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Michiel J M Niesennference, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Colin Pawlowskinference, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
John C O'HoroDivision of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Doug W ChallenerDivision of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Eli Silvertnference, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Greg Donadionference, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Patrick J Lenehannference, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Abinash VirkDivision of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Melanie D SwiftDivision of Preventive, Occupational and Aerospace Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Leigh L SpeicherDivision of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Joel E GordonDepartment of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic Health System, Mankato, Minnesota.
Holly L GeyerDivision of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.
John D HalamkaMayo Clinic Platform, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
A J Venkatakrishnannference, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Venky Soundararajannference, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Andrew D BadleyDivision of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Nference (United States) · USMayo Clinic · USWinnMed · USMayo Clinic Health System · USMayo Clinic Hospital · USMayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM007753 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI WALENSKY, LOREN DAVID · 1985 to 2021
$50.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007753
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Recent reports on waning of COVID-19 vaccine-induced immunity have led to the approval and rollout of additional doses and booster vaccinations. Individuals at increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection are receiving additional vaccine doses in addition to the regimen that was tested in clinical trials. Risks and adverse event profiles associated with additional vaccine doses are currently not well understood. Objective: To evaluate the safety of third-dose vaccination with US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study was conducted using electronic health record (EHR) data from December 2020 to October 2021 from the multistate Mayo Clinic Enterprise. Participants included all 47 999 individuals receiving 3-dose COVID-19 mRNA vaccines within the study setting who met study inclusion criteria. Participants were divided into 2 cohorts by vaccine brand administered and served as their own control groups, with no comparison made between cohorts. Data were analyzed from September through November 2021. Exposures: Three doses of an FDA-authorized COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273. Main Outcomes and Measures: Vaccine-associated adverse events were assessed via EHR report. Adverse event risk was quantified using the percentage of study participants who reported the adverse event within 14 days after each vaccine dose and during a 14-day control period, immediately preceding the first vaccine dose. Results: Among 47 999 individuals who received 3-dose COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, 38 094 individuals (21 835 [57.3%] women; median [IQR] age, 67.4 [52.5-76.5] years) received BNT162b2 (79.4%) and 9905 individuals (5099 [51.5%] women; median [IQR] age, 67.7 [59.5-73.9] years) received mRNA-1273 (20.6%). Reporting of severe adverse events remained low after the third vaccine dose, with rates of pericarditis (0.01%; 95% CI, 0%-0.02%), anaphylaxis (0%; 95% CI, 0%-0.01%), myocarditis (0%; 95% CI, 0%-0.01%), and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (no individuals) consistent with results from earlier studies. Significantly more individuals reported low-severity adverse events after the third dose compared with after the second dose, including fatigue (2360 individuals [4.92%] vs 1665 individuals [3.47%]; P < .001), lymphadenopathy (1387 individuals [2.89%] vs 995 individuals [2.07%]; P < .001), nausea (1259 individuals [2.62%] vs 979 individuals [2.04%]; P < .001), headache (1185 individuals [2.47%] vs 992 individuals [2.07%]; P < .001), arthralgia (1019 individuals [2.12%] vs 816 individuals [1.70%]; P < .001), myalgia (956 individuals [1.99%] vs 784 individuals [1.63%]; P < .001), diarrhea (817 individuals [1.70%] vs 595 individuals [1.24%]; P < .001), fever (533 individuals [1.11%] vs 391 individuals [0.81%]; P < .001), vomiting (528 individuals [1.10%] vs 385 individuals [0.80%]; P < .001), and chills (224 individuals [0.47%] vs 175 individuals [0.36%]; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that although third-dose vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with increased reporting of low-severity adverse events, risk of severe adverse events remained comparable with risk associated with the standard 2-dose regime. These findings suggest the safety of third vaccination doses in individuals who were eligible for booster vaccination at the time of this study.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAgedBNT162 VaccineCohort StudiesElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMalemRNA VaccinesRNA, MessengerSARS-CoV-2VaccinationVaccines, SyntheticBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesmRNA VaccinesRNA, MessengerVaccines, Synthetic

Identifiers

PMID35420661
PMCPMC9011130
OpenAlexW4223989306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.