Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35420638›Full record

ArticleJAMA oncology2022

Expansion of Cancer Risk Profile for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Pathogenic Variants.

Yukihide Momozawa, Rumi Sasai, Yoshiaki Usui, Kouya Shiraishi, Yusuke Iwasaki, Yukari Taniyama, Michael T Parsons, Keijiro Mizukami, Yuya Sekine, Makoto Hirata and 15 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 143 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
143citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
33.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

143 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 197 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pathogenic variants inJournal of medicine and life · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Germline whole-exome sequencing identifies CTNND1 as a candidate gene for hereditary gastric cancer in a large Brazilian cohort.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Comprehensive evidence for the pathogenicity of theJournal of medical genetics · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

83 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Yukihide MomozawaLaboratory for Genotyping Development, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan.
Rumi SasaiLaboratory for Genotyping Development, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan.
Yoshiaki UsuiLaboratory for Genotyping Development, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan.
Kouya ShiraishiDivision of Genome Biology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Yusuke IwasakiLaboratory for Genotyping Development, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan.
Yukari TaniyamaDivision of Cancer Information and Control, Department of Preventive Medicine, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan.
Michael T ParsonsDivision of Genetics and Population Health, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Keijiro MizukamiLaboratory for Genotyping Development, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan.
Yuya SekineLaboratory for Genotyping Development, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan.
Makoto HirataDepartment of Genetic Medicine and Services, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoichiro KamataniLaboratory of Complex Trait Genomics, Department of Computational Biology and Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Mikiko EndoLaboratory for Genotyping Development, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan.
Chihiro InaiLaboratory for Genotyping Development, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan.
Sadaaki TakataLaboratory for Genotyping Development, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan.
Hidemi ItoDivision of Cancer Information and Control, Department of Preventive Medicine, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan.
Takashi KohnoDivision of Genome Biology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Koichi MatsudaLaboratory of Clinical Genome Sequencing, Department of Computational Biology and Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Seigo NakamuraDivision of Breast Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kokichi SuganoDepartment of Genetic Medicine and Services, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Teruhiko YoshidaDepartment of Genetic Medicine and Services, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hidewaki NakagawaLaboratory for Cancer Genomics, RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan.
Keitaro MatsuoDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Department of Preventive Medicine, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan.
Yoshinori MurakamiInstitute of Medical Science, Division of Molecular Pathology, Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Amanda B SpurdleDivision of Genetics and Population Health, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Michiaki KuboRIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences, Yokohama, Japan.
RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPNagoya University · JPQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AUAichi Cancer Center · JPAkita University · JPNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPOkayama University · JPSasaki Institute · JPShowa University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The clinical importance of genetic testing of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in breast, ovarian, prostate, and pancreatic cancers is widely recognized. However, there is insufficient evidence to include other cancer types that are potentially associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 in clinical management guidelines. Objective: To evaluate the association of BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants with additional cancer types and their clinical characteristics in 100 914 individuals across 14 cancer types. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case-control analysis to identify cancer types and clinical characteristics associated with pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 included DNA samples and clinical information from 63 828 patients with 14 common cancer types and 37 086 controls that were sourced from a multi-institutional hospital-based registry, BioBank Japan, between April 2003 and March 2018. The data were analyzed between August 2019 and October 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: Germline pathogenic variants in coding regions and 2 bp flanking intronic sequences in BRCA1 and BRCA2 were identified by a multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based target sequence method. Associations of (likely) pathogenic variants with each cancer type were assessed by comparing pathogenic variant carrier frequency between patients in each cancer type and controls. Results: A total of 65 108 patients (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 64.1 [11.6] years; 27 531 [42.3%] female) and 38 153 controls (mean [SD] age at registration, 61.8 [14.6] years; 17 911 [46.9%] female) were included in this study. A total of 315 unique pathogenic variants were identified. Pathogenic variants were associated with P < 1 × 10-4 with an odds ratio (OR) of greater than 4.0 in biliary tract cancer (OR, 17.4; 95% CI, 5.8-51.9) in BRCA1, esophageal cancer (OR, 5.6; 95% CI, 2.9-11.0) in BRCA2, and gastric cancer (OR, 5.2; 95% CI, 2.6-10.5) in BRCA1, and (OR, 4.7; 95% CI, 3.1-7.1) in BRCA2 in addition to the 4 established cancer types. We also observed an association with 2 and 4 other cancer types in BRCA1 and BRCA2, respectively. Biliary tract, female breast, ovarian, and prostate cancers showed enrichment of carrier patients according to the increased number of reported cancer types in relatives. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this large-scale registry-based case-control study suggest that pathogenic variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2 were associated with the risk of 7 cancer types. These results indicate broader clinical relevance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationNeoplasmsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinCase-Control StudiesFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingGerm-Line MutationHumansJapanMaleBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID35420638
PMCPMC9011177
OpenAlexW4223894169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.