Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35420395›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2022

CAR T-Cell Therapy in the Older Person: Indications and Risks.

Geoffrey Shouse, Alexey V Danilov, Andy Artz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Advancing Immunotherapy in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Dependence and clinical fragility in hematopoietic stem cell transplant and CAR-T therapy: a retrospective study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Poor outcome of older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after progression.Journal of clinical and experimental hematopathology : JCEH · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Treatment of Relapsed Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia in Adult Patients.Current treatment options in oncology · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Selection of bispecific antibody therapies or CAR-T cell therapy in relapsed lymphomas.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2023
    Review
  20. CAR T-cell therapy in aggressive lymphomas-identifying prognostic and predictive markers.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Geoffrey ShouseDepartment of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 E. Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7917-5713
Alexey V DanilovDepartment of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 E. Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA.
Andy ArtzDepartment of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1500 E. Duarte Road, Duarte, CA, 91010, USA. aartz@coh.org.
City of Hope · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewValidated metrics to optimize older adult patient selection for Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell therapy (CART) are lacking; however, some preliminary data suggests that geriatric assessments and cumulative illness rating score may be useful tools. In addition, interventions capable of enhancing outcomes in older adults receiving CART have yet to be elucidated. The purpose of this review is to present data extrapolating from other diseases and therapeutic modalities, related to product selection, toxicity mitigation strategies, comprehensive coordinated models of care, and functional optimization of patients. RECENT

findingsThe most robust data in older adults are among relapsed and refractory (r/r) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients where three products are available with the longest clinical follow up and the most abundant real-world evidence (RWE). Data for the approved CART products for follicular lymphoma (FL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) are relatively new and RWE is lacking in general. Data for CART products in multiple myeloma (MM) and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) are even more recent, but preliminary data in older adults seem to follow the trend of excellent efficacy in this age group with age-stratified toxicity data limited. Landmark trials and RWE studies indicate that the high response rates of CART for older adult patients, age 65 years and older, are maintained, while toxicity may be amplified. Clinically important toxicities include grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome (CRS), neurotoxicity, and infections.

Indexed as

Lymphoma, FollicularLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseLymphoma, Non-HodgkinPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaAdultAgedCytokine Release SyndromeHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveReceptors, Antigen, T-CellReceptors, Antigen, T-CellB-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemiaCARTCellular therapyChimeric antigen receptor T-cellComprehensive geriatric assessmentCumulative illness rating scoreDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaFollicular lymphomaHematologic malignancyMantle cell lymphomaMultiple myelomaOlder adult

Identifiers

PMID35420395
OpenAlexW4223991615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.