Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35420380›Full record

Trial reportEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2022

Bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for postoperative persistent low back pain in lumbar disc surgery.

Mehmet Emin Akyuz, Mustafa Nevzat Firidin

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06018402 (The Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Combination With Physical Therapy on Pain, Disability, and Quality of Life in Patients With Degenerative Scoliosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06018402 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Combination With Physical Therapy on Pain, Disability, and Quality of Life in Patients With Degenerative Scoliosis: Prospective, Randomized, Clinical Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorFatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research HospitalRan2023 to 2025Enrolled26ConditionsLow Back PainArmsphysical therapy, physical therapy + espb
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mehmet Emin AkyuzNeurosurgery Department, Siirt Training and Research Hospital, Siirt, Turkey. mehmeteminakyuz25@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0626-3509
Mustafa Nevzat FiridinSchool of Medicine, Neurosurgery Department, Siirt University, Siirt, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-0927-8848
Siirt Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersistent low back pain is an important disability after lumbar disc surgery. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is highly effective in providing post-surgical pain control, but its effectiveness in long-term persistent low back pain has not been investigated. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to investigate the effect of ESPB on the reduction of persistent low back pain after surgery.

methods162 patients who were operated for lumbar disc herniation under spinal anaesthesia were divided into two groups according to the following criteria; ESPB block group (Group A); applied before surgery and 1 month after surgery and non-ESPB block group (Group B). The preoperative and postoperative 6th month Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (ODI) and Japan Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) scores of the patients were evaluated, and it was examined whether there was a difference.

resultsIn two groups with similar patient characteristics and no significant difference in preoperative pain scores, a significant improvement was observed in pain scores in Group A compared to Group B at the end of the 6th month.

conclusionsESPB, which has a low risk of complications and is simple to perform, has been found useful in the treatment of persistent low back pain after disc surgery.

Indexed as

Low Back PainNerve BlockHumansLumbosacral RegionPostoperative PainUltrasonography, InterventionalErector spinae plane blockLow back painLumbar disc surgery

Identifiers

PMID35420380
OpenAlexW4224087151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.