Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35420330›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

A prospective, multicenter, open-label study of the clinical efficacy of tapentadol extended-release in the treatment of cancer-related pain and improvement in the quality of life of opioid-naïve or opioid-resistant patients.

Ji Yoon Jung, Hong Jae Chon, Young Jin Choi, Sang Eun Yeon, Seok Young Choi, Kyung Hee Lee

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ji Yoon JungDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Daegu, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2017-4994
Hong Jae ChonMedical Oncology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6979-5812
Young Jin ChoiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3525-8154
Sang Eun YeonMedical Affairs, Janssen Korea Ltd, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9682-7955
Seok Young ChoiMedical Affairs, Janssen Korea Ltd, Seoul, Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6542-2963
Kyung Hee LeeDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Daegu, Korea. lkhee@med.yu.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0462-2512
Janssen (Belgium) · BECHA University Bundang Medical Center · KRPusan National University · KRYeungnam University · KRYeungnam University Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of tapentadol extended-release (ER) on pain control and the quality of life (QoL) of patients with moderate to severe chronic cancer pain in clinical practice in Korea.

methodsIn this prospective, open-label, multicenter trial, patients with sustained cancer pain as well as chronic pain, who were or were not using other analgesics were enrolled. Thirteen centers recorded a total of 752 patients during the 6-month observation period, based on the tapentadol ER dose and tolerability, prior and concomitant analgesic treatment, pain intensity, type of pain, adverse effects, and clinical global impression change (CGI-C). Of those 752 patients, 688 were enrolled, and 650 completed the study for efficacy and adverse drug reactions; among them, 349 were cancer patients.

resultsTapentadol ER significantly reduced the mean pain intensity including neuropathic pain during the observation period by 2.9 points (from a mean 7 ± 0.87 to 4.1 ± 2.02). Furthermore, QoL was observed to be significantly improved based on the CGI-C, an objective measure.

conclusionThis study showed that tapentadol ER was effective for treating patients with moderate to severe cancer pain and neuropathic pain, and therefore it significantly improved the patients' QoL.

Indexed as

Cancer PainChronic PainNeoplasmsNeuralgiaAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidDelayed-Action PreparationsHumansPhenolsProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTapentadolTreatment OutcomeAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidDelayed-Action PreparationsPhenolsTapentadolCancer painChronic painKoreanReal-world dataTapentadol

Identifiers

PMID35420330
PMCPMC9135883
OpenAlexW4223913194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.