Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35420329›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

Lack of cognitive impairment in long-term survivors of colorectal cancer.

Janette L Vardy, Gregory R Pond, Lucette A Cysique, Thomas M Gates, Jim Lagopoulos, Corrinne Renton, Louise M Waite, Ian F Tannock, Haryana M Dhillon

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Cognitive impairment is associated with altered blood cell profiles in aggressive lymphoma.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Janette L VardyFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. janette.vardy@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5739-5790
Gregory R PondMcMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Lucette A CysiqueSchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Randwick, Australia.
Thomas M GatesSchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Randwick, Australia.
Jim LagopoulosBrain Mind Research Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Corrinne RentonCentre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-Based Decision-Making, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Louise M WaiteConcord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Ian F TannockPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Haryana M DhillonCentre for Medical Psychology & Evidence-Based Decision-Making, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AUUNSW Sydney · AUConcord Repatriation General Hospital · AUMcMaster University · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

National Health & Medical Research Council Australia APP1176221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOur longitudinal study reported cognitive impairment in 43% of people following diagnosis of localised colorectal cancer (CRC) versus 15% in healthy controls (p < 0.001) and 50% versus 13% 1-2 years later (p < 0.001). Here we evaluate cognitive function and neuroimaging in a subgroup at long-term follow-up. PATIENTS AND

methodsCancer-free Australian participants in the study, and controls, completed cognitive and functional assessments. Neuroimaging was optional. Blood tests included inflammatory markers, clotting factors, sex hormones and apolipoprotein E genotype. The primary endpoint was demographically and practice effect-corrected cognitive scores comparing CRC survivors with controls over time examined using a linear mixed model, adjusted for baseline performance. Secondary endpoints included cognitive impairment rate using the Global Deficit Score [GDS > 0.5], Functional Deficit Score, blood results and neuroimaging.

resultsThe study included 25 CRC survivors (60% men, median age 72) at mean 9 years after baseline (9 received adjuvant chemotherapy) and 25 controls (44% men, median age 68) at mean 6 years after baseline. There were no significant differences in cognitive scores or proportion with cognitive impairment (16 vs. 8%) between survivors and controls and no evidence of accelerated ageing in CRC survivors. Baseline cognitive performance predicted for subsequent cognitive function. There were no differences in functional tests or blood tests between groups. In 18 participants undergoing neuroimaging, 10 CRC survivors had higher myoinositol levels than 8 controls, and lower volume in the right amygdala and caudate and left hippocampal regions.

conclusionsThere was no difference in cognitive capacity and function between CRC survivors and controls 6-12 years after diagnosis. Differences in neuroimaging require confirmation in a larger sample. HIGHLIGHTS: • No evidence of long term cognitive impairment in colorectal cancer survivors compared to controls 6-12 years after diagnosis • No evidence of accelerated cognitive ageing in colorectal cancer survivors • No evidence of long-term functional impairment in colorectal cancer survivors.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionColorectal NeoplasmsAgedAustraliaFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleSurvivorsCognitive function; Survivorship; Colorectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID35420329
PMCPMC9135780
OpenAlexW4223962690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.