Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35420163›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of pathology2022

An overview of mutational and copy number signatures in human cancer.

Christopher D Steele, Nischalan Pillay, Ludmil B Alexandrov

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of pathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Mutational signatures in hematological malignancies.Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Biochemical analysis of HDNA repair · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Christopher D Steele *Research Department of Pathology, Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6110-0086
Nischalan Pillay *Research Department of Pathology, Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0579-4105
Ludmil B Alexandrov *Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3596-4515
Cancer Research UK · GBUC San Diego Health System · US

Funding

Detecting Mutational Signatures of Environmental Mutagens in Heathy Individuals for Personalized Cancer PreventionR01ES032547 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ALEXANDROV, LUDMIL B · 2021 to 2025
$3.4M
Mutational Signatures of a Combined Environmental Exposure: Arsenic and Ultraviolet RadiationR01ES030993 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI HUDSON, LAURIE G, LIU, KE JIAN · 2020 to 2024
$2.5M
Cancer Research UK 18387Cancer Research UK 27969NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES030993NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES032547
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genome of each cell in the human body is constantly under assault from a plethora of exogenous and endogenous processes that can damage DNA. If not successfully repaired, DNA damage generally becomes permanently imprinted in cells, and all their progenies, as somatic mutations. In most cases, the patterns of these somatic mutations contain the tell-tale signs of the mutagenic processes that have imprinted and are termed mutational signatures. Recent pan-cancer genomic analyses have elucidated the compendium of mutational signatures for all types of small mutational events, including (1) single base substitutions, (2) doublet base substitutions, and (3) small insertions/deletions. In contrast to small mutational events, where, in most cases, DNA damage is a prerequisite, aneuploidy, which refers to the abnormal number of chromosomes in a cell, usually develops from mistakes during DNA replication. Such mistakes include DNA replication stress, mitotic errors caused by faulty microtubule dynamics, or cohesion defects that contribute to chromosomal breakage and can lead to copy number (CN) alterations (CNAs) or even to structural rearrangements. These aberrations also leave behind genomic scars which can be inferred from sequencing as CN signatures and rearrangement signatures. The analyses of mutational signatures of small mutational events have been extensively reviewed, so we will not comprehensively re-examine them here. Rather, our focus will be on summarising the existing knowledge for mutational signatures of CNAs. As studying CN signatures is an emerging field, we briefly summarise the utility that mutational signatures of small mutational events have provided in basic science, cancer treatment, and cancer prevention, and we emphasise the future role that CN signatures may play in each of these fields. © 2022 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsNeoplasmsDNA DamageGenomicsHumansMutationcancercopy number signaturesgenomicsmutational signatures

Identifiers

PMID35420163
PMCPMC9324981
OpenAlexW4223962021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.