ReviewThe Journal of pathology2022
An overview of mutational and copy number signatures in human cancer.
Review in The Journal of pathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Whole genome sequencing of 378 prostate cancer metastases reveals tissue selectivity for mismatch deficiency with potential therapeutic implications.Genome medicine · 2025Trial
- Assessing the contribution of rare DNA states to cancer mutational signatures using sequence-specific conformational fingerprinting.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Comprehensive repertoire of the chromosomal alteration and mutational signatures across 16 cancer types.Nature genetics · 2026Article
- Mutational signatures in hematological malignancies.Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Review
- Assessing the contribution of rare DNA states to cancer mutational signatures using sequence-specific conformational fingerprinting.Research square · 2025Article
- Genome doubling as a dynamic driver of ovarian cancer evolution: insights from single-cell sequencing.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Review
- Modelling the ageing dependence of cancer evolutionary trajectories.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2025Review
- Research on the process and molecular mechanism of inhibiting serous ovarian cancer by PRTN3 and its inhibitor Sivelestat.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Article
- The complexity of tobacco smoke-induced mutagenesis in head and neck cancer.Nature genetics · 2025Article
- Recent Advances in Genomic Approaches for the Detection of Homologous Recombination Deficiency.Cancer research and treatment · 2024Review
- Multi-Omics Integration for Liver Cancer Using Regression Analysis.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Article
- Biochemical analysis of HDNA repair · 2024Article
- Computational investigation of missense somatic mutations in cancer and potential links to pH-dependence and proteostasis.PloS one · 2024Article
- Chromosome instability region analysis and identification of the driver genes of the epithelial ovarian cancer cell lines A2780 and SKOV3.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2023Article
- Commonalities and differences in the mutational signature and somatic driver mutation landscape across solid and hollow viscus organs.Oncogene · 2023Review
- Germline de novo mutations in families with Mendelian cancer syndromes caused by defects in DNA repair.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Determinants of tumor immune evasion: the role of T cell exposed motif frequency and mutant amino acid exposure.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Applications of advanced technologies for detecting genomic structural variation.Mutation research. Reviews in mutation researchReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The genome of each cell in the human body is constantly under assault from a plethora of exogenous and endogenous processes that can damage DNA. If not successfully repaired, DNA damage generally becomes permanently imprinted in cells, and all their progenies, as somatic mutations. In most cases, the patterns of these somatic mutations contain the tell-tale signs of the mutagenic processes that have imprinted and are termed mutational signatures. Recent pan-cancer genomic analyses have elucidated the compendium of mutational signatures for all types of small mutational events, including (1) single base substitutions, (2) doublet base substitutions, and (3) small insertions/deletions. In contrast to small mutational events, where, in most cases, DNA damage is a prerequisite, aneuploidy, which refers to the abnormal number of chromosomes in a cell, usually develops from mistakes during DNA replication. Such mistakes include DNA replication stress, mitotic errors caused by faulty microtubule dynamics, or cohesion defects that contribute to chromosomal breakage and can lead to copy number (CN) alterations (CNAs) or even to structural rearrangements. These aberrations also leave behind genomic scars which can be inferred from sequencing as CN signatures and rearrangement signatures. The analyses of mutational signatures of small mutational events have been extensively reviewed, so we will not comprehensively re-examine them here. Rather, our focus will be on summarising the existing knowledge for mutational signatures of CNAs. As studying CN signatures is an emerging field, we briefly summarise the utility that mutational signatures of small mutational events have provided in basic science, cancer treatment, and cancer prevention, and we emphasise the future role that CN signatures may play in each of these fields. © 2022 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.