Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35420128›Full record

ReviewJournal of cell science2022

Deep learning -- promises for 3D nuclear imaging: a guide for biologists.

Guillaume Mougeot, Tristan Dubos, Frédéric Chausse, Emilie Péry, Katja Graumann, Christophe Tatout, David E Evans, Sophie Desset

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cell science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Guillaume MougeotUniversité Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, Inserm, GReD, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3576-7300
Tristan DubosUniversité Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, Inserm, GReD, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4265-2379
Frédéric ChausseUniversité Clermont Auvergne, Clermont Auvergne INP, CNRS, Institut Pascal, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7794-1587
Emilie PéryUniversité Clermont Auvergne, Clermont Auvergne INP, CNRS, Institut Pascal, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6198-9973
Katja GraumannDepartment of Biological and Molecular Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1529-8255
Christophe TatoutUniversité Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, Inserm, GReD, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5215-2338
David E EvansDepartment of Biological and Molecular Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6248-1899
Sophie DessetUniversité Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, Inserm, GReD, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4897-4977

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche 16-IDEX-0001 CAP 20-25Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueEuropean Cooperation in Science and Technology CA16212European Regional Development FundInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleInternational Plant Nucleus ConsortiumOxford Brookes UniversityUniversité Clermont-Auvergne
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For the past century, the nucleus has been the focus of extensive investigations in cell biology. However, many questions remain about how its shape and size are regulated during development, in different tissues, or during disease and aging. To track these changes, microscopy has long been the tool of choice. Image analysis has revolutionized this field of research by providing computational tools that can be used to translate qualitative images into quantitative parameters. Many tools have been designed to delimit objects in 2D and, eventually, in 3D in order to define their shapes, their number or their position in nuclear space. Today, the field is driven by deep-learning methods, most of which take advantage of convolutional neural networks. These techniques are remarkably adapted to biomedical images when trained using large datasets and powerful computer graphics cards. To promote these innovative and promising methods to cell biologists, this Review summarizes the main concepts and terminologies of deep learning. Special emphasis is placed on the availability of these methods. We highlight why the quality and characteristics of training image datasets are important and where to find them, as well as how to create, store and share image datasets. Finally, we describe deep-learning methods well-suited for 3D analysis of nuclei and classify them according to their level of usability for biologists. Out of more than 150 published methods, we identify fewer than 12 that biologists can use, and we explain why this is the case. Based on this experience, we propose best practices to share deep-learning methods with biologists.

Indexed as

Deep LearningCell NucleusImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMicroscopyNeural Networks, Computer3D microscopy images3D nucleus3D segmentationDeep learningImage datasetOpen source

Identifiers

PMID35420128
PMCPMC9016621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.