Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35419980›Full record

Observational studyESC heart failure2022

Association of lipoprotein (a) and 1 year prognosis in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Zhiming Li, Jingguang Liu, Jian Shen, Yumin Chen, Lizhen He, Menghao Li, Xiongwei Xie

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in ESC heart failure, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Lipoprotein(a) Does Not Correlate with Hypertensive Mediated Organ Damage and Subsequent Cardiovascular Events in a Primary Prevention Cohort.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Lipoprotein(a) and panvascular disease.Lipids in health and disease · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhiming LiDepartment of Cardiology, Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital, Huizhou, China.
Jingguang LiuDepartment of Cardiology, Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital, Huizhou, China.
Jian ShenDepartment of Cardiology, Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital, Huizhou, China.
Yumin ChenDepartment of Cardiology, Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital, Huizhou, China.
Lizhen HeDepartment of Cardiology, Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital, Huizhou, China.
Menghao LiDepartment of Cardiology, Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital, Huizhou, China.
Xiongwei XieDepartment of Cardiology, Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital, Huizhou, China.
Huizhou Central People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimCurrent study was to evaluate relationship between baseline serum lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] level and prognosis in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and to explore whether the relationship would be modified by baseline high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (Hs-CRP) level. METHODS AND

resultsThis is an observational prospective study. HFrEF patients from outpatient clinic were consecutively recruited (n = 362). Based on Lp(a) cutoff (30 mg/dL), patients were divided into normal and high Lp(a) groups; and based on Hs-CRP cutoff (3 mg/dL), patients were divided into low-degree and high-degree groups. The 1 year rate of HF rehospitalization was similar between these two groups (22.7% vs. 24.1%, P = 0.18), while the 1 year rate of cardiovascular mortality was higher in Lp(a) ≥ 30 mg/dL versus Lp(a) < 30 mg/dL groups (20.3% vs. 13.3%, P = 0.009), as was composite endpoint (44.4% vs. 36.0%, P < 0.001). After adjusting for covariates, elevated Lp(a) level remained associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 1.22 and 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.64, P = 0.02] and composite endpoint (HR 1.38 and 95% CI 1.16-2.01, P = 0.006). In Hs-CRP ≥ 3 mg/dL group, elevated Lp(a) level was associated with HF rehospitalization, cardiovascular mortality, and composite endpoint, which was not observed in Hs-CRP < 3 mg/dL group. The association was greater for cardiovascular mortality (P-interaction = 0.04) and composite endpoint (P-interaction = 0.02) in Hs-CRP ≥ 3 mg/dL versus Hs-CRP < 3 mg/dL groups.

conclusionElevated Lp(a) level is associated with higher risk of cardiovascular mortality in HFrEF patients, which might be due to enhanced systemic inflammation.

Indexed as

Heart FailureVentricular Dysfunction, LeftC-Reactive ProteinHumansLipoprotein(a)PrognosisProspective StudiesStroke VolumeC-Reactive ProteinLipoprotein(a)Heart failureLipoprotein(a)PrognosisSystemic inflammation

Identifiers

PMID35419980
PMCPMC9288770
OpenAlexW4223996096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.