Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35419898›Full record

ArticleJournal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association2022

Evaluating augmented reality for 'real life' teaching of food portion concepts.

Ioannis Mellos, Yasmine Probst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Development and Validation of a Photographic Food Atlas for Portion Size Estimation and Educational Use in Türkiye.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The impacts of augmented reality teaching tools in health professional education.Canadian journal of dental hygiene : CJDH = Journal canadien de l'hygiene dentaire : JCHD · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Evaluating augmented reality for 'real life' teaching of food portion concepts.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ioannis MellosSmart Foods Centre, School of Medicine, Science Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3310-2084
Yasmine ProbstSmart Foods Centre, School of Medicine, Science Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1971-173X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEstimation of food portions is a vital skill for dietitians, which is developed during formal nutrition training. Skill development is often accomplished by training with food portion estimation tools. These tools can vary in design but evaluations often reveal them to be limited in their effectiveness and generally impractical for everyday use. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate an augmented reality (AR) tool for the estimation food portions.

methodsAn online, quasi-experimental, randomised pre-test post-test study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of three food portion tools with nutrition students. These tools consisted of an online, AR, and an infographic tool (control). Students tested 10 different food images and were asked to estimate food portion sizes with and without assistance of a portion tool to determine absolute error, relative error, and overall improvement in estimation.

resultsA total of 33 participants enrolled in the study with 26 (72.0%) completing the study. The mean absolute error was lowest in the online group (53.0%), followed by AR (59.5%) and control (64.0%). Relative error scores revealed higher accuracy for the AR group (45.5%) followed by online (43.5%), and control group (29.0%). Overall improvement in estimation was highest in the AR group (+12.2%) followed by the online (+11.6%) tool with a decrease seen for the infographic (-1.7%) tool.

conclusionsThe use of technology, notably AR technology, may provide some advantage when training nutrition students in food portion estimation, although further investigation is advised.

Indexed as

Augmented RealityNutritionistsFoodHumansNutritional StatusPortion Sizeaugmented realitydietetics and nutrition trainingfood portion estimationnutrition education

Identifiers

PMID35419898
PMCPMC9790224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.