Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35419702›Full record

SynthesisNeurocritical care2022

A Comparison Between Enteral and Intravenous Nimodipine in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Federico Geraldini, Alessandro De Cassai, Paolo Diana, Christelle Correale, Annalisa Boscolo, Stefano Zampirollo, Laura Disarò, Anna Carere, Nicola Cacco, Paolo Navalesi and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurocritical care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Emerging Treatments for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.CNS & neurological disorders drug targets · 2024
    Review
  18. Pharmacotherapy in SAH: Clinical Trial Lessons.CNS & neurological disorders drug targets · 2024
    Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Federico GeraldiniInstitute of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Padua University Hospital, Via Giustiniani 1, Padua, 35127, Italy. federico.geraldini@aopd.veneto.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1837-0662
Alessandro De CassaiInstitute of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Padua University Hospital, Via Giustiniani 1, Padua, 35127, Italy.
Paolo DianaInstitute of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Padua University Hospital, Via Giustiniani 1, Padua, 35127, Italy.
Christelle CorrealeInstitute of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Padua University Hospital, Via Giustiniani 1, Padua, 35127, Italy.
Annalisa BoscoloInstitute of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Padua University Hospital, Via Giustiniani 1, Padua, 35127, Italy.
Stefano ZampirolloDepartment of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Via Vincenzo Gallucci 13, Padua, 35121, Italy.
Laura DisaròDepartment of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Via Vincenzo Gallucci 13, Padua, 35121, Italy.
Anna CarereDepartment of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Via Vincenzo Gallucci 13, Padua, 35121, Italy.
Nicola CaccoDepartment of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padua, Via Vincenzo Gallucci 13, Padua, 35121, Italy.
Paolo NavalesiInstitute of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Padua University Hospital, Via Giustiniani 1, Padua, 35127, Italy.
Marina MunariInstitute of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Padua University Hospital, Via Giustiniani 1, Padua, 35127, Italy.
University of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our objective was to compare the effectiveness of intravenous and enteral nimodipine in preventing poor outcome from delayed cerebral ischemia in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. We performed a systematic search and a network meta-analysis using the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar. Risk of Bias 2 tool was used to assess risk of bias of included studies. A ranking among methods was performed on the basis of the frequentist analog of the surface under the cumulative ranking curve. Published studies that met the following population, intervention, comparison, outcomes and study (PICOS) criteria were included: patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage aged 15 years or older (P); nimodipine, intravenous and oral formulation (I); placebo or no intervention (C); poor outcome measured at 3 months (defined as death, vegetative state, or severe disability), case fatality at 3 months, delayed cerebral ischemia, delayed ischaemic neurologic deficit, and vasospasm measured with transcranial Doppler or digital subtraction angiography (O); and randomized controlled trials (S). No language or publication date restrictions were applied. Ten studies were finally included, with a total of 1527 randomly assigned patients. Oral and intravenous nimodipine were both effective in preventing poor outcome, delayed cerebral ischemia, and delayed ischaemic neurological deficit. Neither treatment was effective in improving case fatality. Evolving clinical protocols over a 30-year period and the risk of bias of the included studies may limit the strength of our results. Enteral and intravenous nimodipine may have a similar effectiveness in terms of preventing poor outcome, delayed cerebral ischemia, and delayed ischaemic neurological deficit. More research may be needed to fully establish the role of intravenous nimodipine in current clinical practice.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaSubarachnoid HemorrhageVasospasm, IntracranialCerebral InfarctionHumansNimodipineRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeNimodipineNimodipineSubarachnoid hemorrhage

Identifiers

PMID35419702
OpenAlexW4223935906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.