Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35419700›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2022

"None of it was especially easy": improving COVID-19 vaccine equity for people with disabilities.

Jennifer C H Sebring, Gabriela Capurro, Christine Kelly, Cynthia G Jardine, Jordan Tustin, S Michelle Driedger

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Key considerations for applying intersectionality theory to partner and stakeholder engagement in public health.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer C H SebringDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, S113-750 Bannatyne Ave, Winnipeg, MB, R3E 0W3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1031-7154
Gabriela CapurroDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, S113-750 Bannatyne Ave, Winnipeg, MB, R3E 0W3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2211-6229
Christine KellyDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, S113-750 Bannatyne Ave, Winnipeg, MB, R3E 0W3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3316-3258
Cynthia G JardineFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Fraser Valley, 45190 Caen Ave, Chilliwack, BC, V2R 0N3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5999-1422
Jordan TustinSchool of Occupational and Public Health, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 2K3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4364-8037
S Michelle DriedgerDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, S113-750 Bannatyne Ave, Winnipeg, MB, R3E 0W3, Canada. Michelle.Driedger@umanitoba.ca.
University of Manitoba · CAToronto Metropolitan University · CAUniversity of the Fraser Valley · CA

Funding

Canadian Institute for Health Research OV6 - 170370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOur study aimed to (1) identify barriers to equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines for Canadians with disabilities and (2) present recommendations made by study participants to improve immunization programs in terms of inclusivity and equitable access.

methodsWe invited Manitobans living with disabilities to participate in online focus groups. Focus groups were conducted across multiple disability experiences, although one focus group was advertised explicitly as offering simultaneous American Sign Language interpretation to encourage people who are d/Deaf or hard of hearing to participate. Participants were asked about their perspectives on the management of COVID-19 public health measures and vaccination program rollout. Participants were also asked about barriers and facilitators of their vaccination experiences and if they had recommendations for improvement.

resultsThe participants identified three areas where they encountered routine barriers in accessing the COVID-19 vaccines: (1) vaccine information and appointment booking, (2) physical access to vaccination clinics, and (3) vaccination experience. While participants identified specific recommendations to improve vaccine accessibility for people with disabilities, the single most crucial advice consistently identified was to involve people with disabilities in developing accessible immunization programs.

conclusionMeaningful engagement with people living with disabilities in immunization program planning would help ensure that people with disabilities, who already face significant challenges due to COVID-19, are offered the same protections as the rest of the population. These recommendations could be easily transferred to the administration of other large-scale immunization campaigns (e.g., influenza vaccines).

Indexed as

COVID-19Influenza VaccinesPersons with DisabilitiesCanadaCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansVaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesInfluenza VaccinesDisabilitiesImmunizationInequityPandemic

Identifiers

PMID35419700
PMCPMC9007398
OpenAlexW4223974351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.