Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35419631›Full record

ArticlePediatric surgery international2022

Bladder height width ratio on voiding cystourethrogram as a predictor of future valve bladder in children with posterior urethral valve.

Ramesh Babu, Venkata Sai

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ramesh BabuPediatric Urology Unit, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Porur, Chennai, 600116, India. drrameshbabu1@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4831-5795
Venkata SaiDepartments of Pediatric Urology and Radiology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Porur, Chennai, 600116, India.
Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsPrompt and early treatment of valve bladder is known to improve renal outcome in patients with PUV. We hypothesized that bladder height width ratio (HWR) measurement on voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG) could predict development of valve bladder.

methodsAll patients who underwent primary PUV ablation and evaluated later with urodynamics were included. Valve bladder was suspected when there were daytime wetting, persistent hydroureteronephrosis, and elevated detrusor pressures on urodynamics. VCUGs were analysed for HWR: maximum height/width of bladder. ROC curve analysis was performed to identify HWR that could predict development of urodynamic abnormality.

resultsBetween 2012 and 2017, 102 patients were studied: median age at valve ablation 25 days (3-125 days); follow-up 5 years (3-7 years). The ROC curve comparing post-ablation HWR with occurrence of valve bladder showed a cut-off of 1.45 (AUC 0.93). HWR cut-off of 1.45 had a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 84% in predicting future valve bladder. Detrusor overactivity was noticed on urodynamics in 41/55 (74%) of those with HWR > 1.45 compared 5/47 (11%) in those with HWR < 1.45 (p = 0.001).

conclusionBladder height width ratio on VCUG is a useful parameter to predict development of future valve bladder in children with PUV.

Indexed as

UrethraUrinary BladderChildHumansKidneyUrodynamicsUrologic Surgical ProceduresHeight width ratioPosterior urethral valveUrodynamicsValve bladderVCUG

Identifiers

PMID35419631
OpenAlexW4223966497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.