Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35419610›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica2022

Postoperative pain as a risk factor for stiff knee following total knee arthroplasty and excellent patientreported outcomes after manipulation under anesthesia.

Mikko T Rantasalo, Riku A Palanne, Sukhdev Saini, Anne P Vakkuri, Rami Madanat, Skants K Noora

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mikko T RantasaloDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Arthroplasty Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital. mikko.rantasalo@helsinki.fi.
Riku A PalanneDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital. riku.palanne@ksshp.fi.
Sukhdev SainiDepartment of Medical Imaging, HUS Diagnostic Centre, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital. suhkdev.saini@hus.fi.
Anne P VakkuriDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital. anne.vakkuri@hus.fi.
Rami MadanatDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Arthroplasty Center, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital; Terveystalo Kamppi, Helsinki, Finland. madanra@me.com.
Skants K NooraDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital. noora.skants@hus.fi.
University of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeManipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is the first-choice treatment for stiffness following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) unresponsive to pain management and physiotherapy. Some of the predisposing factors and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following MUA remain poorly studied. We retrospectively investigated the etiological risk factors and the outcomes of MUA. PATIENTS AND

methods391 TKA patients from a randomized trial comparing the use of a tourniquet and anesthesia (spinal or general) were analyzed, and patients needing MUA were identified (MUA group). We evaluated in-hospital opioid consumption, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), range of motion (ROM), and pain assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory-short form with a 1-year follow-up.

results39 (10%) MUA patients were identified. The MUA patients were younger (60 years vs. 64 years, difference -4, 95% CI -6 to -1) and had higher postoperative oxycodone consumption (66 mg vs. 51 mg, median difference 11, CI 1-22) than the no-MUA patients. The proportion of MUA patients who contacted the emergency department within 3 months because of pain was larger than that of non-MUA patients (41% vs. 12%, OR 5, CI 3-10). At the 1-year follow-up, the ROM was improved by 39° following MUA, but the total ROM was worse in the MUA group (115° vs. 124°, p < 0.001). No difference was found in the OKS between the MUA and no-MUA patients.

interpretationHigher postoperative pain seems to predict MUA risk. MUA performed 3 months postoperatively offers substantial ROM improvement and comparable PROMs to no-MUA patients 1 year after TKA.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeJoint DiseasesHumansKnee JointPostoperative PainRange of Motion, ArticularRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35419610
PMCPMC9008578
OpenAlexW4224085562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.