Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35419584›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2022

An evidence-based lexical pattern approach for quality assurance of Gene Ontology relations.

Rashmie Abeysinghe, Yuntao Yang, Mason Bartels, W Jim Zheng, Licong Cui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A review on Gene Ontology evaluations.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Identifying Missing IS-A Relations in Orphanet Rare Disease Ontology.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rashmie AbeysingheDepartment of Neurology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Yuntao YangSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Mason BartelsSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
W Jim ZhengSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Licong CuiSchool of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

Funding

Convalescent Plasma to Limit Coronavirus Associated ComplicationsUL1TR003167 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI KARP, DANIEL D, MCPHERSON, DAVID D · 2019 to 2023
$45.3M
An informatics framework for SUDEP Risk Marker Identification and Risk AssessmentR01NS116287 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI CUI, LICONG · 2020 to 2024
$1.7M
Biomedical Terminology Quality Assurance for Enhancing Clinical Queries over Electronic Health RecordsR01LM013335 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI CUI, LICONG · 2020 to 2021
$663k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003167NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS116287NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013335
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene Ontology (GO) is widely used in the biological domain. It is the most comprehensive ontology providing formal representation of gene functions (GO concepts) and relations between them. However, unintentional quality defects (e.g. missing or erroneous relations) in GO may exist due to the large size of GO concepts and complexity of GO structures. Such quality defects would impact the results of GO-based analyses and applications. In this work, we introduce a novel evidence-based lexical pattern approach for quality assurance of GO relations. We leverage two layers of evidence to suggest potentially missing relations in GO as follows. We first utilize related concept pairs (i.e. existing relations) in GO to extract relationship-specific lexical patterns, which serve as the first layer evidence to automatically suggest potentially missing relations between unrelated concept pairs. For each suggested missing relation, we further identify two other existing relations as the second layer of evidence that resemble the difference between the missing relation and the existing relation based on which the missing relation is suggested. Applied to the 15 December 2021 release of GO, this approach suggested a total of 866 potentially missing relations. Local domain experts evaluated the entire set of potentially missing relations, and identified 821 as missing relations and 45 indicate erroneous existing relations. We submitted these findings to the GO consortium for further validation and received encouraging feedback. These indicate that our evidence-based approach can be utilized to uncover missing relations and erroneous existing relations in GO.

Indexed as

Gene Ontologyerroneous relationsGene Ontologylexical patternsmissing relationsontology quality assurance

Identifiers

PMID35419584
PMCPMC9116247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.