ArticleAustin journal of clinical cardiology2020
A Model Incorporating Left Ventricular Impedance Index may be Explanatory for Late Pulmonary Vein Isolation Failure.
Article in Austin journal of clinical cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To study the influence of a flow-based Impedance Index to attempt to explain the persistent late failure rate of Pulmonary Vein Isolation (PVI) in patients with Atrial Fibrillation (AF). Background: We recently described a flow-based Impedance Index for left ventricular ejection into the aorta and noted an association with Major Adverse Cardiovascular Event Rate (MACE). While the Impedance Index is not routinely measured in PVI patients it approximates to measures derivable from the left ventricular ejection fraction (EF). We sought to assess the Impedance Index's influence on PVI failure rate in combination with indices of left atrial size. Methods: In AF patients (n=100) undergoing a Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) imaging examination prior to undergoing PVI we assessed baseline characteristics for their influence on the PVI failure rate at 3-12 months. Uni-variable and multi-variable binary logistic models were performed to find predictors of the PVI failure rate at follow-up. Results: All patients underwent PVI and CMR imaging. A total of 26 (26%) patients had late AF recurrence at 3-12 months follow-up. Multi-variable models that predicted PVI failure were: 1) the baseline Impedance Index and LA volume index (p<0.05) and 2) the baseline Impedance Index and the degree of mitral valve regurgitation (MR) (p<0.001). While the Impedance Index was derived from EF, EF per se was not a predictor of PVI failure (p=0.28). Conclusions: We have provided evidence of the influence of a flow-based Impedance Index on the PVI late failure rate which is significant and remains explanatory when adjusting for measures of atrial size, MR grade and LA volume index. Direct measure of the Impedance Index was not available here and was derived from EF measures. Further work is needed to directly measure the Impedance Index in a PVI population and determine the mechanism for the influence on PVI failure, which may lead to modification of the ablation procedure to improve the success rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35419574PMC9005070W4287910838What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.