Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35419567›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2022

A Novel Framework for the Identification of Reference DNA Methylation Libraries for Reference-Based Deconvolution of Cellular Mixtures.

Shelby Bell-Glenn, Jeffrey A Thompson, Lucas A Salas, Devin C Koestler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shelby Bell-GlennDepartment of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Jeffrey A ThompsonDepartment of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Lucas A SalasDepartment of Epidemiology, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United States.
Devin C KoestlerDepartment of Biostatistics & Data Science, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.

Funding

Mentoring CoreP20GM103418 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI SUSAN J. BROWN · 2012 to 2026
$63.0M
Transgenic & Gene-Targeting Shared ResourceP30CA168524 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI NICOLE L NOLLEN · 2012 to 2026
$40.1M
Relation Between In-utero Vitamin D and Immune Function in Early Childhood P20GM104416 · NIGMS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI CHRISTENSEN, BROCK CLARKE · 2013 to 2022
$23.7M
Using Integrated Omics to Identify Dysfunctional Genetic Mechanisms Influencing Schizophrenia and Sleep DisturbancesP20GM130423 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI ANDREW K. GODWIN · 2019 to 2026
$21.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA168524NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103418NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM104416NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM130423
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reference-based deconvolution methods use reference libraries of cell-specific DNA methylation (DNAm) measurements as a means toward deconvoluting cell proportions in heterogeneous biospecimens (e.g., whole-blood). As the accuracy of such methods depends highly on the CpG loci comprising the reference library, recent research efforts have focused on the selection of libraries to optimize deconvolution accuracy. While existing approaches for library selection work extremely well, the best performing approaches require a training data set consisting of both DNAm profiles over a heterogeneous cell population and gold-standard measurements of cell composition (e.g., flow cytometry) in the same samples. Here, we present a framework for reference library selection without a training dataset (RESET) and benchmark it against the Legacy method (minfi:pickCompProbes), where libraries are constructed based on a pre-specified number of cell-specific differentially methylated loci (DML). RESET uses a modified version of the Dispersion Separability Criteria (DSC) for comparing different libraries and has four main steps: (1) identify a candidate set of cell-specific DMLs, (2) randomly sample DMLs from the candidate set, (3) compute the Modified DSC of the selected DMLs, and (4) update the selection probabilities of DMLs based on their contribution to the Modified DSC. Steps 2-4 are repeated many times and the library with the largest Modified DSC is selected for subsequent reference-based deconvolution. We evaluated RESET using several publicly available datasets consisting of whole-blood DNAm measurements with corresponding measurements of cell composition. We computed the RMSE and

Indexed as

cell heterogeneitycell proportion estimationDNA MethylationEWASIDOLreference-based deconvolution

Identifiers

PMID35419567
PMCPMC9004796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.