Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35419465›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in behavioral sciences2020

Learning Structures: Predictive Representations, Replay, and Generalization.

Ida Momennejad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Replay in the human visual cortex during brief task pauses is linked to implicit learning of successor representations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Hippocampal mismatch signals are based on episodic memories and not schematic knowledge.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Model-based algorithms shape automatic evaluative processing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Empowering safer socially sensitive autonomous vehicles using human-plausible cognitive encoding.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  14. A unified neural representation model for spatial and conceptual computations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ida MomennejadColumbia University.

Funding

The Role of Place and Grid Cells in Human Spatial Navigation and MemoryR01MH104606 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Joshua Jacobs · 2015 to 2026
$6.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH104606
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Memory and planning rely on learning the structure of relationships among experiences. Compact representations of these structures guide flexible behavior in humans and animals. A century after 'latent learning' experiments summarized by Tolman, the larger puzzle of cognitive maps remains elusive: how does the brain learn and generalize relational structures? This review focuses on a reinforcement learning (RL) approach to learning compact representations of the structure of states. We review evidence showing that capturing structures as predictive representations updated via replay offers a neurally plausible account of human behavior and the neural representations of predictive cognitive maps. We highlight multi-scale successor representations, prioritized replay, and policy-dependence. These advances call for new directions in studying the entanglement of learning and memory with prediction and planning.

Indexed as

Dynahierarchical reinforcement learninghippocampusmemorymodel-basedmodel-freeplanningpredictionprefrontal cortexprioritizedReinforcement learningreplaysuccessor representation

Identifiers

PMID35419465
PMCPMC9004662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.