Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35419438›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

Injury and Healing Response of Healthy Peripheral Arterial Tissue to Intravascular Lithotripsy: A Prospective Animal Study.

Feng Liu, Yangyang Ge, Dan Rong, Yating Zhu, Jianhan Yin, Guoyi Sun, Xin Jia, Wei Guo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Feng LiuDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yangyang GeDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Dan RongDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yating ZhuDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jianhan YinDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Guoyi SunDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xin JiaDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Wei GuoDepartment of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a novel clinical technique for the management of severely calcified lesions. However, the biological effects of shock wave on the healthy arterial tissue have not been demonstrated. The preclinical safety study aimed to investigate the vascular response to IVL shock wave compared to plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) in porcine peripheral arteries. Methods: The left and right iliofemoral arterial segments of 16 mini-pigs were subjected to IVL and POBA, respectively. The vascular response was evaluated using quantitative vascular angiography (QVA), light microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) at 0, 5, and 28 days. Results: With the emission of shock wave, adjacent muscle contraction was observed. QVA showed there was no statistically significant difference in percent diameter stenosis and late lumen loss between the two groups. SEM examination showed the endothelial cell layer was intact in both groups at all timepoints. Under light microscopy, no area stenosis was observed. However, IVL shock wave resulted in significantly higher percent area stenosis and intimal area at 28 days. Neointima score showed a trend toward a higher rate in the IVL group, although there was no statistically significant difference at 28 days. There were no statistically significant differences in the scored parameters between groups at all timepoints. However, the parameters of inflammation and neointima showed a trend toward higher scores in the IVL group. After disruption of the internal elastic lamina, the arteries demonstrated significantly neointimal thickening. Conclusions: The safety and operability of IVL are comparable to POBA. The histological response of healthy arteries to IVL shock wave is mild and sustained. IVL shock wave do not cause serious vascular tissue damage, especially endothelial denudation.

Indexed as

animalcalcified lesionintravascular lithotripsyplain old balloon angioplastyporcineshock wave

Identifiers

PMID35419438
PMCPMC8995801
OpenAlexW4220840613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.