Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35419293›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Prognostic Relevance of Progesterone Receptor Levels in Early Luminal-Like HER2 Negative Breast Cancer Subtypes: A Retrospective Analysis.

Anna Diana, Francesca Carlino, Giuseppe Buono, Giuliano Antoniol, Vincenzo Famiglietti, Carmine De Angelis, Simone Carrano, Antonio Piccolo, Ferdinando De Vita, Fortunato Ciardiello and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna DianaDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Francesca CarlinoDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Giuseppe BuonoDepartment of Breast and Thoracic Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy.
Giuliano AntoniolPolytechnique Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Vincenzo FamigliettiDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Carmine De AngelisDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Oncology Division, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Simone CarranoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Oncology Division, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Antonio PiccoloDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Ferdinando De VitaDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Fortunato CiardielloDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
Bruno DanieleMedical Oncology Unit, Ospedale del Mare, Naples, Italy.
Grazia ArpinoDepartment of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Oncology Division, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Michele OrdituraDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy.
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITPolytechnique Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In luminal-like early breast cancer (BC), the lack of Progesterone Receptor (PR) expression generally correlates with more aggressive behavior but the clinical validity of low PR levels remains a debated issue. Methods: The main aim of this retrospective analysis was to assess the survival outcome (Breast cancer specific survival, BCSS) in a cohort of 687 luminal-like HER2 negative early BC patients treated at our Institutions from January 2000 to December 2018, using a sub-classification of tumors in subgroup 1 (PR high/Ki67 low), subgroup 2 (PR high/Ki67 high), subgroup 3 (PR low/Ki67 low), subgroup 4 (PR low/Ki67 high) according to PR and Ki67 values. Results: At a median follow-up of 7 years, BCSS rates were 96.3%, 89%, 86.8% and 85% in the subgroup 1, 2, 3, 4 respectively. Overall, a statistically significant difference in BCSS rates was observed among the 4 subgroups (p=0.0036). On univariate analysis, post-menopause, older age (≥ 50 years), low PR and high Ki67 expression, poorly differentiated grade and size ≥ 2 cm as well as luminal B-like tumors (subgroups 2, 3, 4) were significantly associated with a worse BCSS. Multivariate analysis identified grade, size and subgroup classification of BC as independent prognostic markers of poorer outcome. In particular, subgroups 4, 3 and 2 displayed a significantly higher risk of BC-related death (HR=4.11; p=0.008; HR=3.43; p=0-007; HR=2.57; p=0.020, respectively) when compared to subgroup 1. Conclusions: Our results support the usefulness of PR and Ki67 levels as prognostic markers, corroborating their crucial role in the decision-making process of patients with luminal-like HER2 negative early BC. Clinical application of these parameters should be assessed prospectively.

Indexed as

breast cancerKi67luminal-like subtypeprogesterone receptorprognosis

Identifiers

PMID35419293
PMCPMC8996175
OpenAlexW4220995822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.