ReviewToxicological research2022
The toxic effects of spent crankcase oil exposures; systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Toxicological research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study sought to execute a systematic review and meta-analysis to describe the toxicological implications associated with exposures of humans and laboratory animals to Spent Crankcase Oil (SCO). Databases like PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and PlosOne were searched systematically for all data that assessed the effects of SCO on humans and animals. For each parameter involved in the meta-analysis (those with extractable data), mean, standard deviation, the sample size was extracted for both exposure groups and control. This was then used to compute the standardized mean difference (SMD). Statistical analysis and forest plots were done with RevMan 5.3 software. Twenty-eight (28) studies fulfilled the pre-specified criteria for eligibility. Fourteen (14) of the studies were used for the meta-analysis, which included a total of 1243 subjects from different human epidemiological occupational exposure studies and animal experimental studies. The meta-analysis revealed that SCO exposure caused a significant reduction in the body weight of animals (n = 5, SMD; - 1.2; 95% CI; (- 1.78, - 0.67), Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43188-021-00093-2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.