ReviewCureus2022
The Impact of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Exposure Parameters on Peri-Implant Artifacts: A Literature Review.
Review in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Are the detection and dimensions of peri-implant buccal bone defects influenced by different implant materials and their location? An experimental cone-beam computed tomography study.Journal of periodontology · 2026Article
- Definite Implant Position as Novel Readout for Effectiveness of Ridge Preservation Indicates to Beneficial Effect of Combined Treatment with Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) and Xenogenic Biomaterial in Bone Regeneration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Emergence Angle, Marginal Bone Loss, and Radiographic Corticalization Around MIS Implants: A 5-Year Retrospective Study of Single, Splinted, and Bridge Restorations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Virtual monoenergetic imaging for metal artifact reduction in dental implant surgery using photon-counting detector computed tomography.Imaging science in dentistry · 2026Article
- Ex Vivo Quantitative Evaluation of Beam Hardening Artifacts at Various Implant Locations in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Using Metal Artifact Reduction and Noise Reduction Techniques.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Proposition of a New Scale for Marginal Bone Loss Prediction Around Dental Implants-A 5-Year Follow-Up of Functional Loaded Implants.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Bone quality assessment around dental implants in cone-beam CT images: effect of rotation mode and metal artefact reduction tool.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2025Article
- Efficacy of two radiographic algorithms for detection of peri-implant bone defects on cone-beam computed tomography scans.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Modeling dose uncertainty in cone-beam computed tomography: Predictive approach for deep learning-based synthetic computed tomography generation.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of creating digital twins with different digital dentition models and cone-beam computed tomography.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- CBCT Evaluation of Quality and Quantity of Bones for Immediate Implant Treatment Planning in Central Incisor Area in relation to Arch Form.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2023Article
- Influence of Exposure Parameters and Implant Position in Peri-Implant Bone Assessment in CBCT Images: An In Vitro Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) amounts to an excellent diagnostic tool to evaluate the peri-implant bone thickness in all dimensions. Despite the unquestionable advantages of CBCT, potential artifacts around dental implants might disturb the proper assessment of the surrounding structures. The artifacts may mask osseointegration, shallow bone defects, and other types of radiolucency, which make it difficult to establish an early diagnosis of bone loss. Proper diagnosis of bone defect is necessary to decide about surgical intervention. The aim of this literature review is to assess the CBCT exposure causing artifacts on the peri-implant structures. An electronic search of MEDLINE (PubMed) database includes studies published before July 2021 and supplemented by manual research. Clinical, ex vivo, in vitro, and animal studies evaluating the relationship between exposition parameters and occurrence of artifacts around the dental implant in CBCT studies were included. A literature review revealed that kilovoltage, tube current, and field of view may affect the occurrence of artifacts around dental implants, all of which would compromise radiological evaluation. Therefore, it is feasible to reduce the incidence of artifacts and improve the image quality by appropriate modification of the exposure parameters. However, the reduction of artifacts is often associated with a significant increase in radiation exposure; hence, an effort should be made to minimize the radiation dose in line with the ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) principle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.