Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35419095›Full record

ReviewJournal of medicine and life2022

Triple-negative breast cancer: current treatment strategies and factors of negative prognosis.

Anna Baranova, Mykola Krasnoselskyi, Volodymyr Starikov, Sergii Kartashov, Igor Zhulkevych, Vadym Vlasenko, Kateryna Oleshko, Olga Bilodid, Marina Sadchikova, Yurii Vinnyk

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medicine and life, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 159 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Association of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes with clinical outcomes in patients with triple-negative breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. IntratumoralACS omega · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Subtype-Specific mInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna BaranovaDepartment of Radiology and Oncology, Grigoriev Institute for Medical Radiology NAMS of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2419-9910
Mykola KrasnoselskyiDepartment of Radiology and Oncology, Grigoriev Institute for Medical Radiology NAMS of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5329-5533
Volodymyr StarikovDepartment of Oncology, Kharkiv National Medical University, Kharkiv, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9577-8760
Sergii KartashovDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Oncogynecology, Kharkiv Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Kharkiv, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4680-5213
Igor ZhulkevychDepartment of Oncology, Radiology Diagnostics and Therapy and Radiation Medicine, I. Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University, Ternopil, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6053-5910
Vadym VlasenkoDepartment of Cancer Surgery, Medical Center Molecule, Kharkiv, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8215-1958
Kateryna OleshkoDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Oncogynecology, Kharkiv Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Kharkiv, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6414-9918
Olga BilodidDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Oncogynecology, Kharkiv Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Kharkiv, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6259-6810
Marina SadchikovaDepartment of Cancer Surgery, Radiation Therapy and Palliative Care, Kharkiv Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Kharkiv, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8199-9765
Yurii VinnykDepartment of Cancer Surgery, Radiation Therapy and Palliative Care, Kharkiv Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Kharkiv, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8995-2862
Kharkiv Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education · UAInstitute of Neurology, Psychiatry and Narcology · UAMolecular Oncology (United States) · USI.Horbachevsky Ternopil National Medical University · UA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women and the most common cause of death in working-age women. According to the results of immunohistochemical studies, 10-20% of cases revealed a triple-negative type of breast cancer. This subtype is characterized by significant proliferative activity and growth rate, aggressive clinical course, and early metastasis. This leads to a suspicious prognosis and, accordingly, encourages an increase of surgical treatment radicalism and aggressive systemic treatment. This review briefly analyzes existing treatment strategies for triple-negative breast cancer with a focus on surgical treatment. Surgical treatment is an integral part of complex therapy. Currently, the attention of researchers is focused not only on the radicalism of the operation, ensuring long-term survival, but also on achieving a good cosmetic result that determines the quality of life of patients. In this aspect, organ-preserving and prosthetic methods of operations are promising, the feasibility and effectiveness of which are being discussed. The relevance of choosing the optimal method of operation is evidenced by the lack of generally accepted approaches based on informative markers for the prognosis of the course of the disease. Therefore, the choice of the optimal method of surgical treatment taking into account the individual characteristics of the patient and the tumor, indications for chemotherapy, and radiation therapy remains an unresolved issue and requires further research.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyPrognosisQuality of LifeACT – adjuvant chemotherapyAR – androgen receptorsART – adjuvant radiation therapyBC – breast cancerBMI – body mass indexbreast cancerCT– chemotherapyER – estrogen receptorsIHC – immunohistochemicallate resultLN – lymph nodeNACT – neoadjuvant chemotherapyorgan-preserving operationsradical mastectomyRM – radical mastectomysurgical treatmentTNBC – triple-negative breast cancertriple-negative type

Identifiers

PMID35419095
PMCPMC8999097
OpenAlexW4223937729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.