In one paragraphArticle in Journal of oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 92% of its field
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
15 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Li-Liangzi GuoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (the Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1521-6245 Ben-Hua WuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (the Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9392-9470 Zhi-Chao YuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (the Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5123-9191 Ming-Han LuoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (the Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5056-3421 Feng XiongDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (the Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4021-0817 Cheng WeiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (the Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6373-1826 Rui-Yue ShiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (the Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9123-2103 Ting-Ting LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (the Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1533-5220 Ding-Guo ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (the Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7728-9672 De-Feng LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (the Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3118-6840 Zheng-Lei XuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (the Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5413-7390 Hui-Ming ZhuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (the Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1274-9089 Li-Sheng WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (the Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7418-6114 Jun YaoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (the Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3472-1602 Jinan University · CNTrinity Mother Frances Hospitals and Clinics · US
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Background: Ascites is a common clinical finding caused by many different diseases, so we developed a technique termed single orifice percutaneous endoscopic surgery (SOPES) which can access peritoneal cavity through the contralateral McBurney's point or umbilicus to seek the underlying causes. In this study, we describe the initial clinical experience of SOPES and compare the application of two accesses. Methods: This is a retrospective study performed between 2007 and 2018. Patients with ascites of unknown origin who underwent these two kinds of SOPES were included. Main outcomes were measured by diagnostic accuracy, complication rate, procedure time, time till stitches removal, length of hospital stay, and hospital cost. Results: 148 patients successfully undergone SOPES via the contralateral McBurney's point (IM group, Conclusions: SOPES, which combines the strength of minimally invasive single orifice incision and flexible angles of examination and instrumentation, is a newly developed flexible endoscopic surgical modality that provides new important clinical valuable in evaluation of ascites of unknown origin. Moreover, SOPES via the contralateral McBurney's point was safer than the umbilicus approach.
Identifiers
PMID35419055
PMCPMC9001135
OpenAlexW4225725232
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390