Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35419047›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

Multi-Class Skin Problem Classification Using Deep Generative Adversarial Network (DGAN).

Maleika Heenaye-Mamode Khan, Nuzhah Gooda Sahib-Kaudeer, Motean Dayalen, Faadil Mahomedaly, Ganesh R Sinha, Kapil Kumar Nagwanshi, Amelia Taylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. A novel Skin lesion prediction and classification technique: ViT-GradCAM.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maleika Heenaye-Mamode KhanDepartment of Software and Information Systems, University of Mauritius, Reduit, Mauritius.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9299-1152
Nuzhah Gooda Sahib-KaudeerDepartment of Software and Information Systems, University of Mauritius, Reduit, Mauritius.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3870-3882
Motean DayalenAccenture Technology, Ebene Cyber, Mauritius.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2769-1975
Faadil MahomedalyAccenture Technology, Ebene Cyber, Mauritius.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9085-0871
Ganesh R SinhaDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Myanmar Institute of Information Technology, Mandalay, Myanmar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2384-4591
Kapil Kumar NagwanshiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Amity University Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302006, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3133-978X
Amelia TaylorMalawi University of Business and Applied Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1485-8721

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lack of annotated datasets makes the automatic detection of skin problems very difficult, which is also the case for most other medical applications. The outstanding results achieved by deep learning techniques in developing such applications have improved the diagnostic accuracy. Nevertheless, the performance of these models is heavily dependent on the volume of labelled data used for training, which is unfortunately not available. To address this problem, traditional data augmentation is usually adopted. Recently, the emergence of a generative adversarial network (GAN) seems a more plausible solution, where synthetic images are generated. In this work, we have developed a deep generative adversarial network (DGAN) multi-class classifier, which can generate skin problem images by learning the true data distribution from the available images. Unlike the usual two-class classifier, we have developed a multi-class solution, and to address the class-imbalanced dataset, we have taken images from different datasets available online. One main challenge faced during our development is mainly to improve the stability of the DGAN model during the training phase. To analyse the performance of GAN, we have developed two CNN models in parallel based on the architecture of ResNet50 and VGG16 by augmenting the training datasets using the traditional rotation, flipping, and scaling methods. We have used both labelled and unlabelled data for testing to test the models. DGAN has outperformed the conventional data augmentation by achieving a performance of 91.1% for the unlabelled dataset and 92.3% for the labelled dataset. On the contrary, CNN models with data augmentation have achieved a performance of up to 70.8% for the unlabelled dataset. The outcome of our DGAN confirms the ability of the model to learn from unlabelled datasets and yet produce a good diagnosis result.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID35419047
PMCPMC8995545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.