Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35418945›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2022

GnRH Agonist and hCG (Dual Trigger) Versus hCG Trigger for Final Oocyte Maturation in Expected Normal Responders With a High Immature Oocyte Rate: Study Protocol for a Randomized, Superiority, Parallel Group, Controlled Trial.

Meng-Han Yan, Jing-Xian Cao, Jin-Wei Hou, Wen-Jing Jiang, Dan-Dan Wang, Zhen-Gao Sun, Jing-Yan Song

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Meng-Han YanThe College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Jing-Xian CaoThe First Clinical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Jin-Wei HouThe First Clinical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Wen-Jing JiangThe First Clinical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Dan-Dan WangThe First Clinical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Zhen-Gao SunThe First Clinical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Jing-Yan SongThe First Clinical College, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jinan, China.
Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNShandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The choice of trigger drug for the controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) protocol correlates with the outcome of Methods and Analysis: We propose a study at the Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Chinese Medicine. A total of 90 individuals undergoing COH use a fixed GnRH antagonist protocol. They will be assigned randomly into two groups according to the trigger method and timing: recombinant hCG (6500 IU) will be injected only 36 hours before OPU for final oocyte maturation (hCG-only trigger); co-administration of GnRH-a and hCG for final oocyte maturation, 40 and 34 hours prior to OPU, respectively (Dual trigger). The primary outcome is metaphase-II (MII) oocytes rate. Secondary outcomes are number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, top-quality embryos rate, blastula formation rate, embryo implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, live birth rate, cumulative pregnancy/live birth rates, and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rate. Ethics and Dissemination: The reproductive ethics committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine certified this study (Identifier: SDUTCM/2021.7.26) as ethical. All individuals will sign written informed consent. All data and biological samples will be protected according to law. The results of this study will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. Clinical Trial Registration: [chictr.gov.cn], identifier [ChiCTR2100049292].

Indexed as

Chorionic GonadotropinOvarian Hyperstimulation SyndromeEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneHumansOocytesOvulation InductionPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecombinant ProteinsChorionic GonadotropinGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneRecombinant Proteinsdual triggergonadotropin releasing hormone agonisthuman chorionic gonadotropinin vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injectionnormal ovarian responder

Identifiers

PMID35418945
PMCPMC8996168
OpenAlexW4220873495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.