Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35418938›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022

Challenges and Opportunities of Real-World Data: Statistical Analysis Plan for the Optimise:MS Multicenter Prospective Cohort Pharmacovigilance Study.

Ed Waddingham, Aleisha Miller, Ruth Dobson, Paul M Matthews

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ed WaddinghamDepartment of Brain Sciences and Dementia Research Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, United Kingdom.
Aleisha MillerDepartment of Brain Sciences and Dementia Research Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, United Kingdom.
Ruth DobsonPreventive Neurology Unit, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Paul M MatthewsDepartment of Brain Sciences and Dementia Research Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, United Kingdom.
Imperial College London · GBQueen Mary University of London · GBUK Dementia Research Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Optimise:MS is an observational pharmacovigilance study aimed at characterizing the safety profile of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) in a real world population. The study will categorize and quantify the occurrence of serious adverse events (SAEs) in a cohort of MS patients recruited from clinical sites around the UK. The study was motivated particularly by a need to establish the safety profile of newer DMTs, but will also gather data on outcomes among treatment-eligible but untreated patients and those receiving established DMTs (interferons and glatiramer acetate). It will also explore the impact of treatment switching. Methods: Causal pathway confounding between treatment selection and outcomes, together with the variety and complexity of treatment and disease patterns observed among MS patients in the real world, present statistical challenges to be addressed in the analysis plan. We developed an approach for analysis of the Optimise:MS data that will include disproportionality-based signal detection methods adapted to the longitudinal structure of the data and a longitudinal time-series analysis of a cohort of participants receiving second-generation DMT for the first time. The time-series analyses will use a number of exposure definitions in order to identify temporal patterns, carryover effects and interactions with prior treatments. Time-dependent confounding will be allowed for Results: To date 14 hospitals have joined the study and over 2,000 participants have been recruited. A statistical analysis plan has been developed and is described here. Conclusion: Optimise:MS is expected to be a rich source of data on the outcomes of DMTs in real-world conditions over several years of follow-up in an inclusive sample of UK MS patients. Analysis is complicated by the influence of confounding factors including complex treatment histories and a highly variable disease course, but the statistical analysis plan includes measures to mitigate the biases such factors can introduce. It will enable us to address key questions that are beyond the reach of randomized controlled trials.

Indexed as

cohort studymultiple sclerosispharmacovigilancereal-world datasignal detectionstatistical analysis plan

Identifiers

PMID35418938
PMCPMC8996123
OpenAlexW4220667051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.