Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35418781›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2022

The Potential Role of Genomic Signature in Stage II Relapsed Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Patients: A Mono-Institutional Study.

Michela Roberto, Giulia Arrivi, Emanuela Pilozzi, Andrea Montori, Genoveffa Balducci, Paolo Mercantini, Andrea Laghi, Debora Ierinò, Martina Panebianco, Daniele Marinelli and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. YTHDF3 Promoted Gastric Cancer Progression by Facilitating mAnalytical cellular pathology (Amsterdam) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michela RobertoDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, Medical Oncology Unit A, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Giulia ArriviDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Oncology Unit, Sant' Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Emanuela PilozziDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Anatomia Patologica Unit, Sant' Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Andrea MontoriDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Anatomia Patologica Unit, Sant' Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Genoveffa BalducciDepartment of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translation Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Gastro-intestinal Surgery Unit, Sant' Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Paolo MercantiniDepartment of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translation Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Gastro-intestinal Surgery Unit, Sant' Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Andrea LaghiDepartment of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translation Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Radiology Unit, Sant' Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Debora IerinòDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Oncology Unit, Sant' Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Martina PanebiancoDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Oncology Unit, Sant' Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Daniele MarinelliMedical Oncology Unit B, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Silverio TomaoDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, Medical Oncology Unit A, Policlinico Umberto I, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Paolo MarchettiDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Oncology Unit, Sant' Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Federica MazzucaDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Oncology Unit, Sant' Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITPoliclinico Umberto I · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The absolute benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II CRC is only 3-4%. The identification of biomarkers through molecular profiling could identify patients who will more benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: This retrospective analysis examined tissue blocks from 17 patients affected by relapsed stage II CRC, whose comprehensive genomic profiling of tumors was conducted through next-generation sequencing (NGS) via Roche-FoundationOne Results: Mutations were found in APC (76.5%), TP53 (58.8%) and KRAS (52.9%). Only KRAS wild-type samples showed FBXW7. APC frameshift mutations and MLH1 splice variant were conversely significant correlated (7% v 93%, P = 0.014). The median number of gene mutations reported was 6 (range 2-14). The TP53 mutation was associated most frequently with lung metastasis (P = 0.07) and high tumor budding (P = 0.03). Despite no statistical significance, lung recurrence, LVI/Pni, MSI and more than 6 genetic mutations were correlated to worse DFS and OS. Patients carried co-mutations of TP53-FBXW7 reported the worse DFS (4 v 14 months) and OS (4 v 65 months) compared to the other patients. Conclusion: According to the present analysis, the setting of relapsed CRC emerges as one of the fields of greatest utility for NGS, looking at personalized cancer care.

Indexed as

biomarkerscolon cancernext-generation sequencingNGSstage II

Identifiers

PMID35418781
PMCPMC9000544
OpenAlexW4226166165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.