ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2022
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Subsequent Vascular Events After 6 Months in Chinese Patients with Minor Ischemic Stroke.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- An abbreviated Chinese dyslexia screening behavior checklist for primary school students using a machine learning approach.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- RGX Ensemble Model for Advanced Prediction of Mortality Outcomes in Stroke Patients.BME frontiers · 2024Article
- Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation Outcome Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To develop and validate a machine learning model for predicting subsequent vascular events (SVE) 6 months after mild ischemic stroke (MIS) in Chinese patients. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 495 newly diagnosed MIS patients by collecting their basic information, past medical history, initial NIHSS score, symptoms, obstruction sites of MIS, and MRI results. According to the ratio of 7:3, the dataset was divided into a training set (n=346) and a testing set (n=149) through stratified random sampling. In the training set, the recursive feature elimination (RFE) was used to select the optimal combination of features, and two machine learning algorithms, including the logistic regression (LR) and support vector machines (SVM), were used to build the prediction model, which was further validated by using 5-fold cross-validation. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used on the testing set to evaluate the model's performance, and the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were calculated. The calibration curve and decision curve of the two models were further compared. Results: SVE occurred in 56 cases (11.3%) of 495 patients with MIS during the 6-month follow-up. Finally, the best 15 predictive features were selected, and the top three predictive features were diabetes, posterior cerebral artery lesion, and fasting blood glucose in order. In the testing set, the AUC of the LR model was 0.929 (95% CI: 0.875-0.964), and its accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.832, 0.765, and 0.841, respectively. The AUC of the SVM model was 0.992 (95% CI: 0.962-1.000), and its accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.966, 0.824, and 0.985, respectively. The SVM model's discrimination, calibration, and clinical validity are better than those of the LR model. Conclusion: The predictive models developed using machine learning methods can predict the risk of SVE after 6 months following MIS in Chinese patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.