Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35418741›Full record

ReviewClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2022

Spotlight on the Internal Limiting Membrane Technique for Macular Holes: Current Perspectives.

Tomaso Caporossi, Matteo Mario Carlà, Gloria Gambini, Umberto De Vico, Antonio Baldascino, Stanislao Rizzo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Predicting Visual Recovery in Long-Standing Macular Holes: Surgical Strategies and Role of Optical Coherence Tomography Biomarkers.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The effect of inner limiting membrane peeling on visual fields: Unravelling a source of bias in glaucoma management.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tomaso Caporossi *Ophthalmology Department, "Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS", Rome, 00168, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6902-2983
Matteo Mario Carlà *Ophthalmology Department, "Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS", Rome, 00168, Italy.
Gloria GambiniOphthalmology Department, "Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS", Rome, 00168, Italy.
Umberto De VicoOphthalmology Department, "Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS", Rome, 00168, Italy.
Antonio BaldascinoOphthalmology Department, "Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS", Rome, 00168, Italy.
Stanislao RizzoOphthalmology Department, "Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS", Rome, 00168, Italy.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pars plana vitrectomy has become the standard procedure for primary macular holes (MHs) repair, including the removal of the posterior cortical vitreous, the stripping of eventual epiretinal membranes, and finally an intraocular gas tamponade. During this procedure, peeling the internal limiting membrane (ILM) has been proven to increase closure rates and avoid postoperative reopening in several researches. In fact, even in large MHs more than 400 µm, the advantage of peeling off the ILM was highlighted by better anatomical closure rates. Nevertheless, some authors suggested that ILM peeling is not always essential, because it generates various side effects in retinal structure and function. Furthermore, the ideal amount of ILM peeling and the most effective strategies for removing the ILM are still subject of research. Different surgical modifications have been reported as alternatives to traditional peeling in certain clinical settings, including ILM flaps, ILM scraping, and foveal sparing ILM peeling. As regards large MHs, the introduction of ILM inverted flap appeared as a game changer, offering a significantly higher >90% closure rate when compared to traditional ILM peeling. Modifications to inverted ILM flap procedures have been claimed in recent years, in order to define the best area and direction of ILM peeling and its correlation with functional outcomes. Moreover, several innovations saw the light in the setting of recurrent MHs, such as ILM free flap transposition, inverted ILM flap combined autologous blood clot technique, neurosensory retinal flap, and human amniotic membrane (HAM) plug, claiming higher anatomical success rate also in those complex settings. In conclusion, the aim of this review is to report how the success rate of contemporary macular surgery has grown since the turn of the century, especially for big and chronic MHs, analyzing in which way ILM management became a crucial point of this kind of surgery.

Indexed as

human amniotic membraneinternal limiting membraneinverted flapmacular holepeelingvital dyes

Identifiers

PMID35418741
PMCPMC8995173
OpenAlexW4225569165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.