Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35418695›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Nephrology2022

COVID-19 and kidney disease: insights from epidemiology to inform clinical practice.

Viyaasan Mahalingasivam, Guobin Su, Masao Iwagami, Mogamat Razeen Davids, James B Wetmore, Dorothea Nitsch

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Nephrology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patients With CKD: Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Associations of Pre-Pandemic CKD With Acute and Post-Acute COVID-19: The C4R Study.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Anthraquinones fromDrug design, development and therapy · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Viyaasan MahalingasivamDepartment of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3157-1127
Guobin SuDepartment of Nephrology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, The Second Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5073-9848
Masao IwagamiDepartment of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Mogamat Razeen DavidsDivision of Nephrology, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4900-0231
James B WetmoreDivision of Nephrology, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Dorothea NitschDepartment of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. dorothea.nitsch@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5767-248X
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine · CNHennepin Healthcare Research Institute · USLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBRenal Association · GBStellenbosch University · ZAUniversity of Tsukuba · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, numerous studies have aimed to address the challenges faced by patients with kidney disease and their caregivers. These studies addressed areas of concern such as the high infection and mortality risk of patients on in-centre haemodialysis and transplant recipients. However, the ability to draw meaningful conclusions from these studies has in some instances been challenging, owing to barriers in aspects of usual care, data limitations and problematic methodological practices. In many settings, access to SARS-CoV-2 testing differed substantially between patient groups, whereas the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection varied over time and place because of differences in viral prevalence, targeted public health policies and vaccination rates. The absence of baseline kidney function data posed problems in the classification of chronic kidney disease and acute kidney injury in some studies, potentially compromising the generalizability of findings. Study findings also require attentive appraisal in terms of the effects of confounding, collider bias and chance. As this pandemic continues and in the future, the implementation of sustainable and integrated research infrastructure is needed in settings across the world to minimize infection transmission and both prevent and plan for the short-term and long-term complications of infectious diseases. Registries can support the real-world evaluation of vaccines and therapies in patients with advanced kidney disease while enabling monitoring of rare complications.

Indexed as

COVID-19Kidney DiseasesCOVID-19 TestingHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35418695
PMCPMC9006492
OpenAlexW4223898222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.