ArticleScientific reports2022
Predicting outcomes for locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation with CT-based radiomics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical target volume radiomics from planning CT for pretreatment response prediction in rectal cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of tumor and mesorectum radiomics in predicting neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy response in locally advanced rectal cancer.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2026Article
- Radiomics' Role in Predicting Distant Metastases, Recurrence and Survival Outcome in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2026Review
- Impact of large language models and vision deep learning models in predicting neoadjuvant rectal score for rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Tuning vision foundation models for rectal cancer segmentation from CT scans.Communications medicine · 2025Article
- The Impact of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Clinical Outcomes in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A CHORD Consortium Analysis.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- MRI-based radiomic nomogram for predicting disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Predicting Recurrence in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Using Multitask Deep Learning and Multimodal MRI.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2025Article
- Multi-omics staging of locally advanced rectal cancer predicts treatment response: a pilot study.La Radiologia medica · 2024Article
- A study on the radiomic correlation between CBCT and pCT scans based on modified 3D-RUnet image segmentation.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Radiomics for predicting survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- The Role of Radiomics in Rectal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2023Review
- Role of radiomics in the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A feasibility study was performed to determine if CT-based radiomics could play an augmentative role in predicting neoadjuvant rectal score (NAR), locoregional failure free survival (LRFFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS), disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). The NAR score, which takes into account the pathological tumour and nodal stage as well as clinical tumour stage, is a validated surrogate endpoint used for early determination of treatment response whereby a low NAR score (< 8) has been correlated with better outcomes and high NAR score (> 16) has been correlated with poorer outcomes. CT images of 191 patients with LARC were used in this study. Primary tumour (GTV) and mesorectum (CTV) were contoured separately and radiomics features were extracted from both segments. Two NAR models (NAR > 16 and NAR < 8) models were constructed using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) and the survival models were constructed using regularized Cox regressions. Area under curve (AUC) and time-dependent AUC were used to quantify the performance of the LASSO and Cox regression respectively, using ten folds cross validations. The NAR > 16 and NAR < 8 models have an average AUCs of 0.68 ± 0.13 and 0.59 ± 0.14 respectively. There are statistically significant differences between the clinical and combined model for LRFFS (from 0.68 ± 0.04 to 0.72 ± 0.04), DMFS (from 0.68 ± 0.05 to 0.70 ± 0.05) and OS (from 0.64 ± 0.06 to 0.66 ± 0.06). CTV radiomics features were also found to be more important than GTV features in the NAR prediction model. The most important clinical features are age and CEA for NAR > 16 and NAR < 8 models respectively, while the most significant clinical features are age, surgical margin and NAR score across all the four survival models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.