Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35418656›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Predicting outcomes for locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation with CT-based radiomics.

Fuqiang Wang, Boon Fei Tan, Sharon Shuxian Poh, Tian Rui Siow, Faye Lynette Wei Tching Lim, Connie Siew Poh Yip, Michael Lian Chek Wang, Wenlong Nei, Hong Qi Tan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Clinical target volume radiomics from planning CT for pretreatment response prediction  in rectal cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Role of Radiomics in Rectal Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fuqiang WangDivision of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. wang.fu.qiang@singhealth.com.sg.
Boon Fei TanDivision of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Sharon Shuxian PohDivision of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Tian Rui SiowDivision of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Faye Lynette Wei Tching LimDivision of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Connie Siew Poh YipDivision of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Michael Lian Chek WangDivision of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Wenlong NeiDivision of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Hong Qi TanDivision of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. tan.hong.qi@nccs.com.sg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A feasibility study was performed to determine if CT-based radiomics could play an augmentative role in predicting neoadjuvant rectal score (NAR), locoregional failure free survival (LRFFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS), disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). The NAR score, which takes into account the pathological tumour and nodal stage as well as clinical tumour stage, is a validated surrogate endpoint used for early determination of treatment response whereby a low NAR score (< 8) has been correlated with better outcomes and high NAR score (> 16) has been correlated with poorer outcomes. CT images of 191 patients with LARC were used in this study. Primary tumour (GTV) and mesorectum (CTV) were contoured separately and radiomics features were extracted from both segments. Two NAR models (NAR > 16 and NAR < 8) models were constructed using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) and the survival models were constructed using regularized Cox regressions. Area under curve (AUC) and time-dependent AUC were used to quantify the performance of the LASSO and Cox regression respectively, using ten folds cross validations. The NAR > 16 and NAR < 8 models have an average AUCs of 0.68 ± 0.13 and 0.59 ± 0.14 respectively. There are statistically significant differences between the clinical and combined model for LRFFS (from 0.68 ± 0.04 to 0.72 ± 0.04), DMFS (from 0.68 ± 0.05 to 0.70 ± 0.05) and OS (from 0.64 ± 0.06 to 0.66 ± 0.06). CTV radiomics features were also found to be more important than GTV features in the NAR prediction model. The most important clinical features are age and CEA for NAR > 16 and NAR < 8 models respectively, while the most significant clinical features are age, surgical margin and NAR score across all the four survival models.

Indexed as

Neoplasms, Second PrimaryRectal NeoplasmsHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyPrognosisRectumRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID35418656
PMCPMC9008122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.