Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35418586›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2022

Wearing face masks and possibility for dry eye during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Qian Fan, Minhong Liang, Wenjun Kong, Wei Zhang, Hongxia Wang, Jie Chu, Xin Fang, Yi Song, Wenjing Gao, Yan Wang

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04744805 (Mask-associated Dry Eye Symptoms), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04744805 unknown statusnot on this map

Mask-associated Dry Eye Symptoms: an Online Survey of 6262 Chinese Persons

TypeobservationalSponsorTianjin Eye HospitalRan2021 to 2021Enrolled6,262ConditionsDry Eye SyndromesArmsface mask or not
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Qian Fan *Tianjin Eye Hospital, Tianjin Key Lab of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Tianjin Eye Institute, Nankai University Affiliated Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7617-9962
Minhong Liang *Shanghai Hongkou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0186-724X
Wenjun KongBeijing You'an Hosptial, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9044-8332
Wei ZhangTianjin Eye Hospital, Tianjin Key Lab of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Tianjin Eye Institute, Nankai University Affiliated Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5818-344X
Hongxia WangShanghai Guanghua Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital, Guanghua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8444-878X
Jie ChuDepartment of Ophthalmology, West Hospital of Hetian People's Hospital, Xinjiang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0119-1123
Xin FangHuainan Experimental Middle School, Anhui, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6900-7724
Yi SongTianjin Eye Hospital, Tianjin Key Lab of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Tianjin Eye Institute, Nankai University Affiliated Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5419-5745
Wenjing GaoTianjin Eye Hospital, Tianjin Key Lab of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Tianjin Eye Institute, Nankai University Affiliated Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2048-6074
Yan WangTianjin Eye Hospital, Tianjin Key Lab of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Tianjin Eye Institute, Nankai University Affiliated Eye Hospital, Tianjin, China. wangyan7143@vip.sina.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1257-6635
Nankai University · CNCapital Medical University · CNShanghai Municipal Center For Disease Control Prevention · CNShanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This population-based observational, cross-sectional, and descriptive survey was to investigate the relationship of increased face mask usage in the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) era with mask-associated dry eye (MADE). Participants aged 6-79 years old with formal school education were selected. All participants finished the 19-item questionnaire online, distributed through different social media platforms. From 6925 participants who submitted eligible questionnaires, MADE was reported in 547 participants, which included 419 participants who developed new dry eye symptoms after wearing face masks and 128 participants whose pre-existing dry eye symptoms worsened with mask wearing. Longer time of face mask wearing, nonstandard wearing of face masks, reduced outdoor time, decreased daily reading time, shortened visual display terminals time, and dry environment were positively associated with MADE. There were significant associations between perceived MADE and age, female sex, education, use of glasses and contact lenses, and pre-existing dry eye. MADE was more common in adults aged > 20 years than those aged ≤ 20 years or juveniles. MADE incidence increased. Standard wearing of face masks was suggested as a protective factor for MADE. Awareness about the possible risk of MADE should also be created and the clinical dry eye signs should be verified.Clinical trial registration number: NCT04744805.

Indexed as

COVID-19Dry Eye SyndromesMasksAdolescentAdultAgedChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID35418586
PMCPMC9007396
OpenAlexW4223979282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.