ArticleScientific reports2022
A generative adversarial network for synthetization of regions of interest based on digital mammograms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synthesize contrast-enhanced ultrasound image of thyroid nodules via generative adversarial networks.European radiology · 2026Article
- Dataset of artificial breast cancer MRIs produced from unpaired mammograms.Data in brief · 2026Article
- Deep Learning in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Trends.MedComm · 2025Review
- Research on Beef Marbling Grading Algorithm Based on Improved YOLOv8x.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Research trends on AI in breast cancer diagnosis, and treatment over two decades.Discover oncology · 2024Review
- Generating Synthetic Data for Medical Imaging.Radiology · 2024Review
- BraNet: a mobil application for breast image classification based on deep learning algorithms.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2024Article
- A novel image semantic communication method via dynamic decision generation network and generative adversarial network.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Visual Turing test is not sufficient to evaluate the performance of medical generative models.European radiology experimental · 2023Article
- Automated COVID-19 detection with convolutional neural networks.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Enhancement Technique Based on the Breast Density Level for Mammogram for Computer-Aided Diagnosis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Immunity-based Ebola optimization search algorithm for minimization of feature extraction with reduction in digital mammography using CNN models.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- AI in Breast Cancer Imaging: A Survey of Different Applications.Journal of imaging · 2022Review
- Advanced dwarf mongoose optimization for solving CEC 2011 and CEC 2017 benchmark problems.PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) models are becoming pervasive and applicable to computer vision, image processing, and synthesis problems. The performance of these models is often improved through architectural configuration, tweaks, the use of enormous training data, and skillful selection of hyperparameters. The application of deep learning models to medical image processing has yielded interesting performance, capable of correctly detecting abnormalities in medical digital images, making them surpass human physicians. However, advancing research in this domain largely relies on the availability of training datasets. These datasets are sometimes not publicly accessible, insufficient for training, and may also be characterized by a class imbalance among samples. As a result, inadequate training samples and difficulty in accessing new datasets for training deep learning models limit performance and research into new domains. Hence, generative adversarial networks (GANs) have been proposed to mediate this gap by synthesizing data similar to real sample images. However, we observed that benchmark datasets with regions of interest (ROIs) for characterizing abnormalities in breast cancer using digital mammography do not contain sufficient data with a fair distribution of all cases of abnormalities. For instance, the architectural distortion and breast asymmetry in digital mammograms are sparsely distributed across most publicly available datasets. This paper proposes a GAN model, named ROImammoGAN, which synthesizes ROI-based digital mammograms. Our approach involves the design of a GAN model consisting of both a generator and a discriminator to learn a hierarchy of representations for abnormalities in digital mammograms. Attention is given to architectural distortion, asymmetry, mass, and microcalcification abnormalities so that training distinctively learns the features of each abnormality and generates sufficient images for each category. The proposed GAN model was applied to MIAS datasets, and the performance evaluation yielded a competitive accuracy for the synthesized samples. In addition, the quality of the images generated was also evaluated using PSNR, SSIM, FSIM, BRISQUE, PQUE, NIQUE, FID, and geometry scores. The results showed that ROImammoGAN performed competitively with state-of-the-art GANs. The outcome of this study is a model for augmenting CNN models with ROI-centric image samples for the characterization of abnormalities in breast images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.