Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35418499›Full record

ArticleFamily medicine and community health2022

International examples of primary care COVID-19 preparedness and response: a comparison of four countries.

Felicity Goodyear-Smith, Michael Kidd, Tijani Idris Ahmad Oseni, Nagwa Nashat, Robert Mash, Mehmet Akman, Robert L Phillips, Chris van Weel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family medicine and community health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Changes in general practice use and costs with COVID-19 and telehealth initiatives: analysis of Australian whole-population linked data.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  6. French General Practitioners' Adaptations for Patients with Suspected COVID-19 in May 2020.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Felicity Goodyear-SmithDepartment of General Practice and Primary Health Care, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand f.goodyear-smith@auckland.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0002-6657-9401
Michael KiddDepartment of Health, Australian Government, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Tijani Idris Ahmad OseniDepartment of Family Medicine, Ambrose Alli University, Ekpoma, Nigeria.
Nagwa NashatSchool of Medicine, Menoufia University, Shebin El-Kom, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-9470-5105
Robert MashDepartment of Family and Emergency Medicine, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Mehmet AkmanDepartment of Family Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Robert L PhillipsCenter for Professionalism and Value in Health Care, American Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
Chris van WeelAcademic Unit of General Practice, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3653-4701

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report the learnings gleaned from a four-country panel (Australia, South Africa, Egypt and Nigeria) sharing their countries' COVID-19 primary healthcare approaches and implementation of policy at the World Organization of Family Doctor's World virtual conference in November. The countries differ considerably with respect to size, national economies, average age, unemployment rates and proportion of people living rurally. South Africa has fared the worst with respect to waves of COVID-19 cases and deaths. All countries introduced strategies such as border closure, COVID-19 testing, physical distancing and face masks. Australia and Nigeria mobilised primary care, but the response was mostly public health and hospital-based in South Africa and Egypt. All countries rapidly adopted telehealth. All countries emphasised the critical importance of an integrated response between primary care and public health to conduct surveillance, diagnose cases through testing, provide community-based care unless hospitalisation is required and vaccinate the population to reduce infection spread.

Indexed as

COVID-19AustraliaCOVID-19 TestingHumansMasksPrimary Health CareCOVID-19Family MedicineGeneral PracticeHealth PolicyPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID35418499
PMCPMC9013790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.