ArticleThe journal of international advanced otology2022
Gender Effects on Binaural Speech Auditory Brainstem Response.
Article in The journal of international advanced otology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The effects of interaural time and level differences on the binaural interaction component of the auditory brainstem response in Cope's gray treefrogs.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026Article
- Evaluating neural encoding of prosody-related F0 changes in emotional speech using the speech FFR in normal-hearing adults.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The Influence of Sex, Ear, and Age on Auditory Brainstem Responses Recorded with the NeuroAudio System.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Age and sex differences in speech FFR suggest early central auditory aging.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
- Athleticism and sex impact neural processing of sound.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe speech auditory brainstem response is a tool that provides direct information on how speech sound is temporally and spectrally coded by the auditory brainstem. Speech auditory brainstem response is influenced by many variables, but the effect of gender is unclear, particularly in the binaural recording. Studies on speech auditory brainstem response evoked by binaural stimulation are limited, but gender studies are even more limited and contradictory. This study aimed at examining the effect of gender on speech auditory brainstem response in adults.
methodsTime- and frequency-domain analyses of speech auditory brainstem response recordings of 30 healthy participants (15 women and 15 men) aged 18-35 years with normal hearing and no musical education were obtained. For each adult, speech auditory brainstem response was recorded with the syllable /da/ presented binaurally. Peaks of time (V, A, C, D, E, F, and O) and frequency (fundamental frequency, first formant frequency, and high frequency) domains of speech auditory brainstem response were compared between men and women.
resultsV, A, and F peak latencies of women were significantly shorter than those of men (P< .05). However, no difference was found in the peak amplitude of the time (P > .05) or frequency domain between women and men (P > .05).
conclusionGender differences in binaural speech auditory brainstem response are significant in adults, particularly in the time domain. When speech stimuli are used for auditory brainstem responses, normative data specific to gender are required. Preliminary normative data from this study could serve as a reference for future studies on binaural speech auditory brainstem response among Turkish adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.