Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35418342›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2022

Evaluating Regional Nodal Irradiation Allocation and Association with Oncologic Outcomes in NSABP B-18, B-27, B-40, and B-41.

Raymond B Mailhot Vega, Shu Wang, Eric D Brooks, Oluwadamilola T Oladeru, Natalie A Lockney, Lisa E Spiguel, Shannon M MacDonald, Eleftherios P Mamounas, Nancy P Mendenhall, Paul G Okunieff and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. DEGRO practical guidelines: radiotherapy of breast cancer-regional nodal irradiation.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pediatric and Adolescent Hodgkin Lymphoma: Paving the Way for Standards of Care and Shared Decision Making.American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Raymond B Mailhot VegaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville and Jacksonville, Florida. Electronic address: rbmailhot@floridaproton.org.
Shu WangDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Florida College of Public Health and Health Professions & College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.
Eric D BrooksDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville and Jacksonville, Florida.
Oluwadamilola T OladeruDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville and Jacksonville, Florida.
Natalie A LockneyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Lisa E SpiguelDepartment of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.
Shannon M MacDonaldDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Eleftherios P MamounasDepartment of General Surgery, Orlando Health, Orlando, Florida.
Nancy P MendenhallDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville and Jacksonville, Florida.
Paul G OkunieffDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville and Jacksonville, Florida.
Ji-Hyun LeeDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Florida College of Public Health and Health Professions & College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.
Julie A BradleyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville and Jacksonville, Florida.
University of Florida · USFlorida College · USHarvard University · USOrlando Health · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
Statistics CoreU10CA180822 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Mei-Yin C Polley · 2014 to 2026
$146.4M
NRG Oncology NCORP Research Base-BIQSFPUG1CA189867 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI Deborah Watkins Bruner, Lisa A. Kachnic · 2014 to 2026
$140.5M
Using social networks to map and evaluate team science across CTSA hubsUL1TR001427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI MITCHELL, DUANE A. · 2015 to 2024
$37.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001427NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180822NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189867
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere is a lack of level I evidence to guide radiation therapy recommendations for patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. We used 4 neoadjuvant chemotherapy trials to determine which patients benefit from regional nodal irradiation (RNI). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We obtained data from the NSABP (National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project) B-18, B-27, B-40, and B-41 clinical trials. B-40 and B-41 allowed RNI at physician's discretion. We evaluated locoregional recurrence (LRR), distant recurrence, disease-free survival, and overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier, Peto-Peto, χ

resultsMedian follow-up for B-18, B-27, B-40, and B-41 was 13.7, 9.7, 4.5, and 5.1 years, respectively, including 742, 2254, 1154, and 504 patients for analysis. On multivariable analysis, factors significantly associated with RNI included tumor size, ypN status, and tumor subtype; Hispanic patients were less likely to receive RNI. Patients with ypN+HER2+ disease who received RNI had improved OS. B-40 patients with ypN+HR+ disease had improved LRR. On multivariable analysis for the B-40 and B-41 study population, RNI was not associated with significantly improved OS, disease-free survival, distant recurrence, or LRR.

conclusionsRNI was associated with a clinical benefit for patients with ypN+HER2+ and ypN+HR+ disease. RNI was not significantly associated with a clinically beneficial outcome for the entire cohort. Prospective phase 3 clinical trials are needed to establish guidelines for patients who should receive RNI after neoadjuvant treatment, and action is necessary to eliminate the disparity in care delivery shown for Hispanic women.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35418342
PMCPMC9250597
OpenAlexW4220909420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.