Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35418304›Full record

ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2022

Impact of COVID-19 lockdown restrictions on cardiac rehabilitation participation and behaviours in the United Kingdom.

Richard Kirwan, Fatima Perez de Heredia, Deaglan McCullough, Tom Butler, Ian G Davies

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Experiences of People with Cardiovascular Disease during COVID-19 in Sweden: A Qualitative Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Richard KirwanSchool of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4645-0077
Fatima Perez de HerediaSchool of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK. F.PerezDeHerediaBenedicte@ljmu.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2537-3327
Deaglan McCulloughCarnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK. D.McCullough@leedsbeckett.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9882-9639
Tom ButlerFaculty of Health, Social Care and Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0818-1566
Ian G DaviesResearch Institute of Sport and Exercise Science, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3722-8466
Liverpool John Moores University · GBEdge Hill University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 lockdown measures led to the suspension of centre-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR). We aimed to describe the impact of lockdown on CR behaviours and perceptions of efficacy in a sample of CR participants.

methodsAn online survey was conducted amongst CR participants from May to October 2020, COVID-19-related lockdown restrictions. Anthropometric data, participant-determined levels of motivation and self-perceived efficacy, CR practices etc., pre- and post-lockdown, were collected.

resultsThe probability of practicing CR in public gyms and hospitals decreased 15-fold (47.2% pre-, 5.6% post-lockdown; OR[95% CI] 0.065[0.013; 0.318], p < 0.001), and 34-fold (47.2% pre, 2.8% post; OR[95% CI] 0.029[0.004; 0.223], p < 0.001), respectively. Amongst participants, 79.5% indicated that their CR goals had changed and were 78% less likely to engage in CR for socialization after lockdown (47.2% pre, 16.7% post; OR[95% CI] 0.220[0.087; 0.555]; p = 0.002). The probability of receiving in-person supervision decreased by 90% (94.4% pre, 16.7% post; OR[95% CI] 0.011[0.002; 0.056]), while participants were almost 7 times more likely to use online supervision (11.1% pre, 44.4% post; OR[95% CI] 6.824[2.450; 19.002]) (both p < 0.001). Fifty percent indicated that their enjoyment of CR was lower than before lockdown and 27.8% reported they would be less likely to continue with CR in the newer format.

conclusionsLockdown was associated with considerable changes in how CR was practiced, motivation levels and willingness to continue with CR. Further research is warranted to develop and improve strategies to implement in times when individuals cannot attend CR in person and not only during pandemics.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular diseaseCoronary heart diseaseExerciseHealth behaviourPhysical activitySARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35418304
PMCPMC9007266
OpenAlexW4223994150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.