Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35418216›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts2022

Identifying targets for increased biogas production through chemical and organic matter characterization of digestate from full-scale biogas plants: what remains and why?

Eva-Maria Ekstrand, Annika Björn, Anna Karlsson, Anna Schnürer, Linda Kanders, Sepehr Shakeri Yekta, Martin Karlsson, Jan Moestedt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Thermal hydrolysis treatment of digestates derived from food waste and sewage sludge - effect on residual methane potential.Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eva-Maria EkstrandDepartment of Thematic Studies - Environmental Change, Linköping University, 58183, Linköping, Sweden.
Annika BjörnDepartment of Thematic Studies - Environmental Change, Linköping University, 58183, Linköping, Sweden.
Anna KarlssonBiogas Research Center, Linköping University, 58183, Linköping, Sweden.
Anna SchnürerDepartment of Thematic Studies - Environmental Change, Linköping University, 58183, Linköping, Sweden.
Linda KandersBiogas Research Center, Linköping University, 58183, Linköping, Sweden.
Sepehr Shakeri YektaDepartment of Thematic Studies - Environmental Change, Linköping University, 58183, Linköping, Sweden.
Martin KarlssonBiogas Research Center, Linköping University, 58183, Linköping, Sweden.
Jan MoestedtDepartment of Thematic Studies - Environmental Change, Linköping University, 58183, Linköping, Sweden. jan.moestedt@liu.se.
Linköping University · SESwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SE

Funding

Energimyndigheten 35624-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study examines the destiny of macromolecules in different full-scale biogas processes. From previous studies it is clear that the residual organic matter in outgoing digestates can have significant biogas potential, but the factors dictating the size and composition of this residual fraction and how they correlate with the residual methane potential (RMP) are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to generate additional knowledge of the composition of residual digestate fractions and to understand how they correlate with various operational and chemical parameters. The organic composition of both the substrates and digestates from nine biogas plants operating on food waste, sewage sludge, or agricultural waste was characterized and the residual organic fractions were linked to substrate type, trace metal content, ammonia concentration, operational parameters, RMP, and enzyme activity.

resultsCarbohydrates represented the largest fraction of the total VS (32-68%) in most substrates. However, in the digestates protein was instead the most abundant residual macromolecule in almost all plants (3-21 g/kg). The degradation efficiency of proteins generally lower (28-79%) compared to carbohydrates (67-94%) and fats (86-91%). High residual protein content was coupled to recalcitrant protein fractions and microbial biomass, either from the substrate or formed in the degradation process. Co-digesting sewage sludge with fat increased the protein degradation efficiency with 18%, possibly through a priming mechanism where addition of easily degradable substrates also triggers the degradation of more complex fractions. In this study, high residual methane production (> 140 L CH

conclusionsOperation at unstable conditions was one reason for the high residual macromolecule content and high RMP. The outgoing protein content was relatively high in all digesters and improving the degradation of proteins represents one important way to increase the VS reduction and methane production in biogas plants. Post-treatment or post-digestion of digestates, targeting microbial biomass or recalcitrant protein fractions, is a potential way to achieve increased protein degradation.

Indexed as

AmmoniaAnaerobic digestionBiogasDegradation efficiencyDigestateEnzyme activityFull-scale biogas plantsMacromoleculesResidual methane potentialTrace metals

Identifiers

PMID35418216
PMCPMC8830174
OpenAlexW4210952740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.