Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35418096›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts2022

Activity-based protein profiling reveals dynamic substrate-specific cellulase secretion by saprotrophic basidiomycetes.

Nicholas G S McGregor, Casper de Boer, Mikhaaeel Santos, Mireille Haon, David Navarro, Sybrin Schroder, Jean-Guy Berrin, Herman S Overkleeft, Gideon J Davies

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology for biofuels and bioproducts, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. A time-course analysis ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Microbiology spectrum · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nicholas G S McGregorYork Structural Biology Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, The University of York, Heslington, YO10 5DD, York, UK.
Casper de BoerLeiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Mikhaaeel SantosYork Structural Biology Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, The University of York, Heslington, YO10 5DD, York, UK.
Mireille HaonUMR1163 Biodiversité et Biotechnologie Fongiques, Faculté des Sciences de Luminy, INRAE, Aix Marseille Univ, 13288, Marseille, France.
David NavarroUMR1163 Biodiversité et Biotechnologie Fongiques, Faculté des Sciences de Luminy, INRAE, Aix Marseille Univ, 13288, Marseille, France.
Sybrin SchroderLeiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jean-Guy BerrinUMR1163 Biodiversité et Biotechnologie Fongiques, Faculté des Sciences de Luminy, INRAE, Aix Marseille Univ, 13288, Marseille, France.
Herman S OverkleeftLeiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Gideon J DaviesYork Structural Biology Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, The University of York, Heslington, YO10 5DD, York, UK. Gideon.davies@york.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7343-776X

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R001162/1European Research Council ERC-2011-AdG-290836European Research Council ERC-2020-SyG-951231French National 499 Research Agency ANR-13-BIME-0002 to JGBNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek 2018-714.018.002Royal Society Ken Murray Research Professorship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFungal saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass occurs concurrently with the secretion of a diverse collection of proteins, together functioning as a catalytic system to liberate soluble sugars from insoluble composite biomaterials. How different fungi respond to different substrates is of fundamental interest to the developing biomass saccharification industry. Among the cornerstones of fungal enzyme systems are the highly expressed cellulases (endo-β-glucanases and cellobiohydrolases). Recently, a cyclophellitol-derived activity-based probe (ABP-Cel) was shown to be a highly sensitive tool for the detection and identification of cellulases.

resultsHere we show that ABP-Cel enables endo-β-glucanase profiling in diverse fungal secretomes. In combination with established ABPs for β-xylanases and β-D-glucosidases, we collected multiplexed in-gel fluorescence activity-based protein profiles of 240 secretomes collected over ten days from biological replicates of ten different basidiomycete fungi grown on maltose, wheat straw, or aspen pulp. Our results reveal the remarkable dynamics and unique enzyme fingerprints associated with each species substrate combination. Chemical proteomic analysis identifies significant arsenals of cellulases secreted by each fungal species during growth on lignocellulosic biomass. Recombinant production and characterization of a collection of probe-reactive enzymes from GH5, GH10, and GH12 confirm that ABP-Cel shows broad selectivity towards enzymes with endo-β-glucanase activity.

conclusionUsing small-volume samples with minimal sample preparation, the results presented here demonstrate the ready accessibility of sensitive direct evidence for fungal enzyme secretion during early stages of growth on complex lignocellulosic substrates.

Indexed as

Activity-based probeActivity-based protein profilingBasidiomyceteBiomassCellulaseCyclophellitolEnzyme identificationEnzyme secretionFilamentous fungiFluorescenceGlycoside hydrolaseKineticsPichia pastorisSecretome

Identifiers

PMID35418096
PMCPMC8764865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.