ArticleBMC medical education2022
Cross-cultural validation and psychometric testing of the Debriefing Experience Scale (DES): a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing two post-resuscitation debriefing frameworks: a randomized cross-over simulation study.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2026Article
- Building Skills in Infection Prevention Through Simulation: Insights from Nursing Students in Brazil and Peru.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026Article
- Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the febrile convulsion knowledge scale for parents/caregivers: translation and validation study.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the oncology nurses health behaviors determinants scale: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Validation of the PL-C Quest in China: understanding the pictorial physical literacy self-report scale.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Development and validation of the Chinese version of the self-management support scale for kidney transplant recipients.BMC nursing · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Debriefing Experience Scale (DES) is a tool that is used to explore nursing students' subjective experiences during a debriefing and to help determine best debriefing practices. A Chinese version of the scale has not been found; its development can enhance learning in simulation activites in Chinese healthcare education programs.
methodsA simplified Chinese version of the DES was developed and tested using 34 Chinese undergraduate (second year) nursing students. They participated in six simulation scenarios and debriefings. Eight experts were consulted to determine the content validity of the scale. Critical ratio method, Cronbach's alpha, intraclass correlation coefficient, correlation coefficient and factor analysis were used in testing the psychometric properties of the scale.
resultsAnalysis of 200 scales showed that the simplified Chinese version of the DES had good potential in discriminatiing Chinese nursing students' experiences of debriefing.
conclusionsThe simplified Chinese DES was effective in evaluating the experience of debriefing. A larger sample size and multicenter research is needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.