Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35418048›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

If we build it, will they come? Perspectives on pharmacy-based naloxone among family and friends of people who use opioids: a mixed methods study.

Susannah Slocum, Jenny E Ozga, Rebecca Joyce, Alexander Y Walley, Robin A Pollini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Implementation and Evaluation of a Bystander Naloxone Training Course.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Susannah SlocumDepartment of Behavioral Medicine & Psychiatry, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Jenny E OzgaDepartment of Behavioral Medicine & Psychiatry, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Rebecca JoyceDepartment of Behavioral Medicine & Psychiatry, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Alexander Y WalleyDepartment of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Robin A PolliniDepartment of Behavioral Medicine & Psychiatry, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA. Robin.Pollini@hsc.wvu.e0du.
West Virginia University · USBoston University · US

Funding

Pharmacy Naloxone Distribution: Assessing a New Tool to Reduce Overdose MortalityR01DA040807 · NIDA · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI POLLINI, ROBIN A · 2016 to 2021
$2.9M
Identifying Stigma Reduction Targets in the Context of an Appalachian HIV OutbreakR21DA054899 · NIDA · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI POLLINI, ROBIN A · 2022 to 2023
$426k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA040807NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA054899
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExpanding access to the opioid antagonist naloxone to reduce overdose mortality is a public health priority in the United States. Naloxone standing orders (NSOs) have been established in many states to increase naloxone dispensing at pharmacies, but increased pharmacy access does not ensure optimal uptake among those likely to witness an overdose. In a prior statewide purchase trial, we documented high levels of naloxone access at Massachusetts pharmacies under a statewide NSO. In this study, we characterize barriers to pharmacy-based naloxone uptake among potential opioid overdose "bystanders" (friends or family of people who use opioids) that may be amenable to intervention.

methodsEligible bystanders were Massachusetts residents ≥ 18 years of age, did not use illicit opioids in the past 30 days, and knew someone who currently uses illicit opioids. We used a sequential mixed methods approach, in which a series of semi-structured qualitative interviews (N = 22) were conducted April-July 2018, to inform the development of a subsequent quantitative survey (N = 260), conducted February-July 2020.

resultsMost survey participants (77%) reported ever obtaining naloxone but few (21%) attempted to purchase it at a pharmacy. Qualitative participants revealed that barriers to utilizing the NSO included low perceived risk of overdose, which was rooted in misconceptions regarding the risks of prescription opioid misuse, denial about their loved one's drug use, and drug use stereotypes; inaccurate beliefs about the impact of naloxone on riskier opioid use; and concerns regarding anticipated stigma and confidentiality. Many participants had engaged in mutual support groups, which served as a source of free naloxone for half (50%) of those who had ever obtained naloxone.

conclusionsDespite high levels of pharmacy naloxone access in Massachusetts, few bystanders in our study had attempted to obtain naloxone under the NSO. Low perceived risk of overdose, misinformation, stigma, and confidentiality were important barriers to pharmacy naloxone uptake, all of which are amenable to intervention. Support groups provided a setting for addressing stigma and misinformation and provided a discreet and comfortable setting for naloxone access. Where these groups do not exist and for bystanders who do not participate in such groups, pharmacies are well-positioned to fill gaps in naloxone availability.

Indexed as

Drug OverdoseOpioid-Related DisordersPharmaciesPharmacyAnalgesics, OpioidFriendsHumansNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsUnited StatesAnalgesics, OpioidNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsNaloxoneOpioid overdosePharmaciesStanding order

Identifiers

PMID35418048
PMCPMC9006069
OpenAlexW4225524160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.