Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35418039›Full record

Observational studyBMC nephrology2022

Polish attitudes towards unspecified kidney donation: a cross-sectional study.

Paulina Kurleto, Lucyna Tomaszek, Irena Milaniak, Katrina A Bramstedt

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC nephrology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04789122 (Assessment of Poles' Attitudes Towards Living Kidney Donation), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04789122 completednot on this map

Assessment of Poles' Attitudes Towards Living Kidney Donation

TypeobservationalSponsorAndrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow UniversityRan2020 to 2021Enrolled1,000ConditionsEnd Stage Renal DiseaseArmsAttitude assessment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Paulina KurletoFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski University, ul. Gustawa Herlinga-Grudzińskiego 1, 30-705, Krakow, Poland. pkurleto@afm.edu.pl.
Lucyna TomaszekFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski University, ul. Gustawa Herlinga-Grudzińskiego 1, 30-705, Krakow, Poland.
Irena MilaniakFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski University, ul. Gustawa Herlinga-Grudzińskiego 1, 30-705, Krakow, Poland.
Katrina A BramstedtFaculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, Bond University, 14 University Drive Gold Coast, Gold Coast, QLD, 4226, Australia.
Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University · PLBond University · AUJohn Paul II Hospital · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic kidney disease effects about 4.2 million people in Poland, yet Polish organ donation research is rare. In addition, compared to other countries in the world, Poland has a relatively low living donation rate. Still, little is known about how Poles would react to the possibility of living kidney donation to strangers. A study was conducted to examine public opinion about living kidney donation, as well as their knowledge about it, willingness to donate to a stranger, and support for a possible expansion of existing Polish organ donation legislation to include living donation to strangers.

methodsA self-report questionnaire, which included a socio-demographic datasheet (9 questions), 16 questions about attitudes towards living donation, and 1 question about knowledge concerning transplantation law was sent to the respondents from December 2020 - February 2021. Logistic regression was used to assess factors affecting the support of the legalization of unspecified kidney donation amongst the participants.

resultsMore than sixty percent (62.1) of respondents supported legalization of unspecified living kidney donation. Such legalization would be accepted by people who accept a choice of a family member to donate a kidney to a stranger (OR = 3.50; Cl 95%: 1.49 to 4.85), who think bone-marrow transplant is safe (OR = 2.65; Cl 95%: 1.80 to 3.91), recognize the benefit of carrying out tests before donating a kidney (OR = 2.56; Cl 95%: 1.79 to 3.69), would agree to receive a kidney from another person (OR = 2.24; Cl 95%: 2.53 to 3.13), or would agree to donate organs after death (OR = 2.06; Cl 95%: 1.45 to 2.95). However, support for unspecified living kidney donation would not be given by respondents fearing the risk of organ trafficking (OR = 0.54; Cl 95%: 0.38 to 0.79).

conclusionsIn Poland there is strong support for legalization of unspecified living kidney donation. It is vital that future legislation define organ trafficking as a crime with serious punishment so that legal unspecified living kidney donation is not hindered.

trial registrationThe study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT04789122 ) on 08/03/2021.

Indexed as

Living DonorsTissue and Organ ProcurementAttitudeCross-Sectional StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansKidneyPolandSurveys and QuestionnairesKidney transplantationLegislationOrgan donationPolandUnspecified kidney donation

Identifiers

PMID35418039
PMCPMC9006497
OpenAlexW4224099511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.