Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35418031›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2022

An integrated primary care-based programme of PRE-Pregnancy cARE to improve pregnancy outcomes in women with type 2 Diabetes (The PREPARED study): protocol for a multi-method study of implementation, system adaptation and performance.

Rita Forde, Olubunmi Abiola, Janet Anderson, Debra Bick, Anna Brackenridge, Anita Banerjee, Mark Chamley, Kia-Chong Chua, Lily Hopkins, Katharine Hunt and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Nursing Intervention on Children with Type 2 Diabetes.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Rita FordeFaculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, James Clerk Maxwell Building, 57 Waterloo Road, London, UK. rita.forde@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1906-2431
Olubunmi AbiolaPPI Member, c/o Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, James Clerk Maxwell Building, 57 Waterloo Road, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5779-0670
Janet AndersonSchool of Health Sciences, City, University of London, Northampton Square, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1452-8370
Debra BickWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8557-7276
Anna BrackenridgeDiabetes and Endocrinology Department, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4102-3084
Anita BanerjeeDiabetes and Endocrinology Department, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9442-9662
Mark ChamleyNorth Wood Group Practice, Crown Dale, Norwood, London, UK.
Kia-Chong ChuaCentre for Implementation Science, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE5 8AF, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6693-6333
Lily HopkinsFaculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, James Clerk Maxwell Building, 57 Waterloo Road, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4621-1829
Katharine HuntDiabetes Department, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Caldecot Road, London, UK.
Helen R MurphyNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5489-0614
Helen RogersDiabetes Department, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Caldecot Road, London, UK.
Renee RomeoHealth Services and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
James ShearerHealth Services and Population Research, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1658-9767
Kirsty WinkleyFaculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, James Clerk Maxwell Building, 57 Waterloo Road, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1725-6040
Angus ForbesFaculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, James Clerk Maxwell Building, 57 Waterloo Road, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3331-755X
King's College London · GBKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GBCity, University of London · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe number of women of childbearing age with Type 2 diabetes(T2DM) is increasing, and they now account for > 50% of pregnancies in women with pre-existing diabetes. Diabetes pregnancies without adequate pre-pregnancy care have higher risk for poor outcomes (miscarriages, birth-defects, stillbirths) and are associated with increased complications (caesarean deliveries, macrosomic babies, neonatal intensive-care admissions). The risks and costs of these pregnancies can be reduced with pregnancy preparation (HbA1c, ≤ 6.5%, 5 mg folic acid and stopping potentially harmful medicines). However, 90% of women with T2DM, most of whom are based in primary care, are not adequately prepared for pregnancy. This study will evaluate a programme of primary care-based interventions (decision-support systems; pre-pregnancy care-pathways; pregnancy-awareness resources; professional training; and performance monitoring) to improve pregnancy preparation in women with T2DM.

methodsThe study aims to optimise the programme interventions and estimate their impact on pregnancy preparation, pre-pregnancy care uptake and pregnancy outcomes. To evaluate this multimodal intervention, we will use a multi-method research design following Complex Adaptive Systems (CAS) theory, refining the interventions iteratively during the study. Thirty GP practices with ≥ 25 women with T2DM of reproductive age (18-45 years) from two South London boroughs will be exposed to the intervention. This will provide > 750 women with an estimated pregnancy incidence of 80-100 to study. The research involves: a clinical audit of processes and outcomes; a process evaluation informing intervention feasibility, implementation, and behaviour change; and a cost-consequences analysis informing future economic evaluation. Performance data will be collected via audits of GP systems, hospital antenatal clinics and pregnancy outcomes. Following CAS theory, we will use repeated measurements to monitor intervention impact on pregnancy preparation markers at 4-monthly intervals over 18-months. We will use performance and feasibility data to optimise intervention effects iteratively. The target performance for the intervention is a 30% increase in the proportion of women meeting pre-pregnancy care criteria. DISCUSSION: The primary output will be development of an integrated programme of interventions to improve pregnancy preparation, pre-pregnancy care uptake, and reduce adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with T2DM. We will also develop an implementation plan to support the introduction of the interventions across the NHS.

trial registrationISRCTN47576591 ; February 8, 2022.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2AdolescentAdultFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMiddle AgedPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePrenatal CarePrimary Health CareResearch DesignYoung AdultComplex adaptive systemsPre-pregnancy carePrimary careType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID35418031
PMCPMC9008985
OpenAlexW4223987807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.