Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35418030›Full record

Observational studyBMC cancer2022

Tumor histology is an independent prognostic factor in locally advanced cervical carcinoma: A retrospective study.

Lenny Gallardo-Alvarado, David Cantú-de León, Rebeca Ramirez-Morales, Gabriel Santiago-Concha, Salim Barquet-Muñoz, Rosa Salcedo-Hernandez, Cinthya Reyes, Sandra Perez-Alvarez, Delia Perez-Montiel, Carlos Perez-Plasencia and 2 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04537273 (Clinical and Pathological Characteristics as Prognostic Factors in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04537273 completednot on this map

Clinical and Pathological Characteristics as Prognostic Factors in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Study

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Institute of CancerologíaRan2005 to 2020Enrolled1,954ConditionsCervical CancerArmsDescriptive and analytical
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lenny Gallardo-Alvarado *Programa de Maestría Y Doctorado en Ciencias Médicas, Odontológicas Y de La Salud. UNAM. Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico.
David Cantú-de León *Dirección de Investigación, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico. dcantude@gmail.com.
Rebeca Ramirez-MoralesSubdirección de Investigación Clínica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Gabriel Santiago-ConchaDepartamento de Radioterapia, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Salim Barquet-MuñozDepartamento de Ginecología, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Rosa Salcedo-HernandezDepartamento de Ginecología, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Cinthya ReyesSubdirección de Investigación Clínica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Sandra Perez-AlvarezDepartamento de Radioterapia, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Delia Perez-MontielDepartamento de Patología, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Carlos Perez-PlasenciaLaboratorio de Genómica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Elizabeth Trejo-DuranDepartamento de Radioterapia, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.
Juan Pablo GaliciaSubdirección de Investigación Clínica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEven with different histologic origins, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (AC) are considered a single entity, and the first-line treatment is the same. Locally advanced disease at the diagnosis of cervical cancer is the most important prognostic factor, the recurrence rate is high, making it necessary to evaluate prognostic factors other than clinical or radiological staging; histology could be one of them but continues to be controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate tumor histology as a prognostic factor in terms of treatment outcomes, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in a retrospective cohort of patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Carcinoma (LACC).

methodsThe records of 1291patients with LACC were reviewed, all of them were treated with 45-50 Gy of external beam radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy and brachytherapy. A descriptive and comparative analysis was conducted. Treatment response was analyzed by the chi-square test; DFS and OS were calculated for each histology with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test; and the Cox model was applied for the multivariate analysis.

resultsWe included 1291 patients with LACC treated from 2005 to 2014, of which 1154 (89·4%) had SCC and 137 (10·6%) had AC. Complete response to treatment was achieved in 933 (80·8%) patients with SCC and 113 (82·5%) patients with AC. Recurrence of the disease was reported in 29·9% of SCC patients and 31·9% of AC patients. Five-year DFS was 70% for SCC and 62·2% for AC. The five-year OS rates were 74·3% and 60% for SCC and AC, respectively. The mean DFS was 48·8 months for SCC vs 46·10 for AC (p = 0·043), the mean OS was 50·8 for SCC and 47·0 for AC (p = 0·002).

conclusionOur findings support the hypothesis that SCC and AC are different clinical entities.

trial registrationNCT04537273 .

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaCarcinoma, Squamous CellUterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleHumansNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesCervical carcinomaHistologyLocally advancedPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID35418030
PMCPMC9006627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.