Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35418007›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of health policy and management2022

Community Participation in Primary Healthcare in the South Sudan Boma Health Initiative: A Document Analysis.

Loubna Belaid, Iván Sarmiento, Alexander Dimiti, Neil Andersson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of health policy and management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Loubna BelaidCIET-PRAM (Participatory Research at McGill), Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0550-0560
Iván SarmientoCIET-PRAM (Participatory Research at McGill), Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2871-1464
Alexander DimitiDepartment of Reproductive Health, Ministry of Health, Juba, South Sudan.
Neil AnderssonCIET-PRAM (Participatory Research at McGill), Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1121-6918

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity participation is central to primary healthcare, yet there is little evidence of how this works in conflict settings. In 2016, South Sudan's Ministry of Health launched the Boma Health Initiative (BHI) to improve primary care services through community participation.

methodsWe conducted a document analysis to examine how well the BHI policy addressed community participation in its policy formulation. We reviewed other policy documents and published literature to provide background context and supplementary data. We used a deductive thematic analysis that followed Rifkin and colleagues' community participation framework to assess the BHI policy.

resultsThe BHI planners included inputs from communities without details on how the needs assessment was conducted at the community level, what needs were considered, and from which community. The intended role of communities was to implement the policy under local leadership. There was no information on how the Initiative might strengthen or expand local women's leadership. Official documents did not contemplate local power relations or address gender imbalance. The policy approached households as consumers of health services.

conclusionAlthough the BHI advocated community participation to generate awareness, increase acceptability, access to services and ownership, the policy document did not include community participation during policy cycle.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationDocument AnalysisHumansPrimary Health CareSouth SudanCommunity ParticipationDocument AnalysisHealthcare AccessPrimary HealthcareSouth Sudan

Identifiers

PMID35418007
PMCPMC10105198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.