ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2022
HIV oral self-screening test among HIV/STD/TB clinic attendees: A mixed-method pilot investigation examining merit for larger evaluation.
Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acceptability, usability, and willingness to pay for HIV self-test kits distributed through community-based, PLHIV network-led and private practitioners models in India: Results from the STAR III Initiative.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2024Article
- The Implementation of HIV Self-Testing in Resource-Limited Settings Where the HIV Disease Burden is High.International journal of public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & objectives: Globally, several countries consider HIV self-test as an important element in the toolbox to end AIDS by 2030. Against this background, the present investigation was conducted to pilot test the performance of an indigenous HIV oral self-test (HIVOST) and explore its acceptability. The overall purpose was to examine if this kit could serve as a promising tool and merit future larger clinical evaluation. Methods: A concurrent mixed-method investigation was undertaken during March-October 2019. One hundred and thirty two consecutive HIV/sexually transmitted diseases/tuberculosis clinic attendees were invited for participation; of whom, 100 were enrolled, and among them, 40 provided consent for qualitative in-depth interviews. The HIVOST kit assessed for its performance served as the 'index test', which worked on the principle of lateral flow chromatography. The results of the HIVOST were interpreted independently by the study physicians and participants at 20 min. HIVOST kit performance was assessed against the HIV confirmatory blood test result based on the national algorithm (3 rapid test or 1 ELISA and 2 rapid test) serving as the 'reference'. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and inter-rater agreement were estimated. The voices and concerns of the study participants were coded followed by identification of qualitative themes and ideas. Results: The sensitivity and specificity of the index test at the end of 20 min as interpreted by the participants were 83.3 per cent [95% confidence interval (CI): 69.8 to 92.5] and 98 per cent (95% CI: 89.4 to 99.5), respectively. Study physicians and participants independently interpreted HIVOST results with substantial inter-rater agreement (kappa value 0.88; 95% CI: 0.78-0.97). All HIVOST test strips were valid. Majority of the participants preferred saliva over blood for HIV self-test. 'Comfort', 'confidentiality' and 'convenience' were the perceived advantages of HIVOST. Some of the participants wished the package inserts contained 'how-to-do instructions in local languages', 'expiry date (if any)' and 'contact helpline number'. A few of them highlighted the need for a confirmatory HIV result following oral self-test. Concerns of the participants revolved around potential self-harm following HIVOST-positive result and safe disposal of kits. Interpretation & conclusions: Two major highlights of the present investigation are (i) high level of concordance in HIVOST results interpreted by participants and physicians, and (ii) encouraging level of acceptance of HIVOST. These findings and encouraging HIVOST performance statistics lend support towards large-scale clinical evaluation of this index test.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.